91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11753525)
41. Cytogenetic analysis in 61 couples with spontaneous abortions.
Jiang J; Fu M; Wang D
Chin Med J (Engl); 2001 Feb; 114(2):200-1. PubMed ID: 11780207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Application of quantitative fluorescent PCR with short tandem repeat markers to the study of aneuploidies in spontaneous miscarriages.
Diego-Alvarez D; Garcia-Hoyos M; Trujillo MJ; Gonzalez-Gonzalez C; Rodriguez de Alba M; Ayuso C; Ramos-Corrales C; Lorda-Sanchez I
Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1235-43. PubMed ID: 15760965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls.
Robberecht C; Schuddinck V; Fryns JP; Vermeesch JR
Genet Med; 2009 Sep; 11(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 19617844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study.
Menasha J; Levy B; Hirschhorn K; Kardon NB
Genet Med; 2005 Apr; 7(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 15834243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Parental origin and cell stage of non-disjunction of double trisomy in spontaneous abortion.
Li QY; Tsukishiro S; Nakagawa C; Tanemura M; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Suzumori K; Sonta S
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2005 Mar; 45(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 15737127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Chromosome analysis of 303 pregnancy losses in Mexico.
Garduño-Zarazúa LM; Mayén DG; Meléndez-Hernández R; Paz-Martínez AJ; Ramírez-Arroyo E; Sosa D; Aguinaga M; Pérez-Durán J; Ríos O; López-Valdez J; Torres L; Frias S
Gac Med Mex; 2024; 160(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 38753554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Operator experience and sample quality in genetic amniocentesis.
Welch RA; Salem-Elgharib S; Wiktor AE; Van Dyke DL; Blessed WB
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):189-91. PubMed ID: 16389030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Using FISH to increase the yield and accuracy of karyotypes from spontaneous abortion specimens.
Jobanputra V; Esteves C; Sobrino A; Brown S; Kline J; Warburton D
Prenat Diagn; 2011 Aug; 31(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 21484844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Informatics enhanced SNP microarray analysis of 30 miscarriage samples compared to routine cytogenetics.
Lathi RB; Massie JA; Loring M; Demko ZP; Johnson D; Sigurjonsson S; Gemelos G; Rabinowitz M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e31282. PubMed ID: 22403611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization pregnancy loss.
Spandorfer SD; Davis OK; Barmat LI; Chung PH; Rosenwaks Z
Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1265-9. PubMed ID: 15136087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Quantification of fetal nucleated cells in maternal blood of pregnant women with a male trisomy 21 fetus using molecular cytogenetic techniques.
Krabchi K; Gadji M; Samassekou O; Grégoire MC; Forest JC; Drouin R
Prenat Diagn; 2006 Jan; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 16374897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Routine histopathologic analysis of product of conception following first-trimester spontaneous miscarriages.
Tasci Y; Dilbaz S; Secilmis O; Dilbaz B; Ozfuttu A; Haberal A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Dec; 31(6):579-82. PubMed ID: 16343264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Preparation and culture of products of conception and other solid tissues for chromosome analysis.
Warburton D
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2001 May; Chapter 8():Unit 8.5. PubMed ID: 18428315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Fluorescent in situ hybridization: an effective and less costly technique for genetic evaluation of products of conception in pregnancy losses.
Fejgin MD; Pomeranz M; Liberman M; Fishman A; Amiel A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Sep; 84(9):860-3. PubMed ID: 16097976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Reducing misdiagnosis caused by maternal cell contamination in genetic testing for early pregnancy loss.
Volozonoka L; Gailite L; Perminov D; Kornejeva L; Fodina V; Kempa I; Miskova A
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2020 Dec; 66(6):410-420. PubMed ID: 33059488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Application of a new molecular technique for the genetic evaluation of products of conception.
Grati FR; Gomes DM; Ganesamoorthy D; Marcato L; De Toffol S; Blondeel E; Malvestiti F; Loeuillet L; Ruggeri AM; Wainer R; Maggi F; Aboura A; Dupont C; Tabet AC; Guimiot F; Slater HR; Simoni G; Vialard F
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jan; 33(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23168908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi.
Grati FR; Grimi B; Frascoli G; Di Meco AM; Liuti R; Milani S; Trotta A; Dulcetti F; Grosso E; Miozzo M; Maggi F; Simoni G
Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Mar; 14(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 16418738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Human chorionic gonadotropin attracts regulatory T cells into the fetal-maternal interface during early human pregnancy.
Schumacher A; Brachwitz N; Sohr S; Engeland K; Langwisch S; Dolaptchieva M; Alexander T; Taran A; Malfertheiner SF; Costa SD; Zimmermann G; Nitschke C; Volk HD; Alexander H; Gunzer M; Zenclussen AC
J Immunol; 2009 May; 182(9):5488-97. PubMed ID: 19380797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses.
Leung WC; Waters JJ; Chitty L
Prenat Diagn; 2004 Oct; 24(10):790-5. PubMed ID: 15503279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluating the rate and risk factors for fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling.
Odibo AO; Dicke JM; Gray DL; Oberle B; Stamilio DM; Macones GA; Crane JP
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 18827123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
