161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11753893)
1. Patch testing by additional series of allergens: results of further experiences.
Francalanci S; Giorgini S; Ricci L; Sertoli A
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 11753893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Associated positive patch test reactions to standard contact allergens.
Brasch J; Uter W; Geier J; Schnuch A;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Dec; 12(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 11753892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which children should we patch test?
Beattie PE; Green C; Lowe G; Lewis-Jones MS
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2007 Jan; 32(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17004990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hapten selection for patch tests in the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiologic data].
Romano C; Carosso A; Bosio D; Chiesa A; Gullino A; Turrini A
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25 Suppl(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 14979180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Delayed patch test reading after 5 days: the Mayo Clinic experience.
Davis MD; Bhate K; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Richardson DM; Weaver AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 59(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 18513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system.
Lazarov A; David M; Abraham D; Trattner A
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 17295688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Excited skin syndrome: study of 39 patients.
Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Bedrikow R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Jun; 13(2):59-65. PubMed ID: 12022121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
