91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11754203)
1. Determination of liquid-based cervical cytology specimen adequacy using cellular light scatter and flow cytometry.
Grundhoefer D; Patterson BK
Cytometry; 2001 Dec; 46(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 11754203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of flow cytometry as a quality control device for liquid-based cervical cytology specimens.
Kottaridi C; Georgoulakis J; Kassanos D; Pappas A; Spathis A; Margari N; Aninos D; Karakitsos P
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2010 Jan; 78(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 19746413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases.
Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology.
Hutchinson ML; Cassin CM; Ball HG
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Sep; 96(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 1877527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow cytometry of human gynecologic specimens using log chromomycin A3 fluorescence and log 90 degrees light scatter.
Barrett DL; Jensen RH; King EB; Dean PN; Mayall BH
J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):573-8. PubMed ID: 374623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimens.
Dotters DJ; Carney CN; Droegemueller W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Oct; 159(4):814-9. PubMed ID: 3177528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New version of the pathology practice guideline for cervical cytology: sharpened criteria for adequacy; expanded use of new techniques].
van Kemenade FJ; Wiersma T; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1283-6. PubMed ID: 17624158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How adequate is adequate for the collection of endocervical specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis testing?
Beebe JL; Gershman KA; Kelley JK; Hagner D; Creede P
Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Nov; 26(10):579-83. PubMed ID: 10560722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of endocervical specimen adequacy on ligase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Loeffelholz MJ; Jirsa SJ; Teske RK; Woods JN
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3838-41. PubMed ID: 11682495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proliferation patterns of cervical cells as visualized in Leiden liquid cytology slides.
Luzzatto L; van Haaften C; Boon ME
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Jul; 31(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15236256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method.
Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Factors Associated with Specimen Adequacy for Conventional Cervical Cytology in Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand.
Anantaworapot A; Manusook S; Tanprasertkul C; Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4209-4212. PubMed ID: 27797219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: emphasis on suboptimal specimens.
Vassilakos P; Cossali D; Albe X; Alonso L; Hohener R; Puget E
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 8669185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of endocervical-specimen adequacy on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the APTIMA COMBO 2 assay.
Rogers CK; Wood BJ; Rizzo P; Gaydos CA
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 44(12):4564-5. PubMed ID: 17065266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specimen adequacy of ThinPrep sample preparations in a direct-to-vial study.
Corkill M; Knapp D; Martin J; Hutchinson ML
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9022724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of p16INK4a and ProEx C immunostaining on cervical ThinPrep cytology and biopsy specimens.
Oberg TN; Kipp BR; Vrana JA; Bartholet MK; Fales CJ; Garcia R; McDonald AN; Rosas BL; Henry MR; Clayton AC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Aug; 38(8):564-72. PubMed ID: 19937941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
