BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11754473)

  • 1. Mixture models for linkage analysis of affected sibling pairs and covariates.
    Devlin B; Jones BL; Bacanu SA; Roeder K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Jan; 22(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 11754473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of methods incorporating quantitative covariates into affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Tsai HJ; Weeks DE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 30(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 16355406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-Free Linkage Analysis of a Binary Trait.
    Xu W; Ma J; Greenwood CMT; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():343-373. PubMed ID: 28980254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric simulation-based statistics for detecting linkage in general pedigrees.
    Davis S; Schroeder M; Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Apr; 58(4):867-80. PubMed ID: 8644751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Mixture models for linkage analysis of affected sibling pairs with covariates".
    Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):444-8; author reply 449-55; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 12432509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing among covariate-defined subgroups: issues and findings for affected relatives.
    Bull SB; Mirea L; Briollais L; Logan AG
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(1-3):94-106. PubMed ID: 14614243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests for covariate-associated heterogeneity in IBD allele sharing of affected relatives.
    Mirea L; Briollais L; Bull S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):44-60. PubMed ID: 14691956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A generalized estimating equations approach to linkage analysis in sibships in relation to multiple markers and exposure factors.
    Thomas DC; Qian D; Gauderman WJ; Siegmund K; Morrison JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S737-42. PubMed ID: 10597523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tree-based recursive partitioning methods for subdividing sibpairs into relatively more homogeneous subgroups.
    Shannon WD; Province MA; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 11255239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
    Sergeev AS
    Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage analysis for diseases with variable age of onset.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 10686502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased efficiency of case-control association analysis by using allele-sharing and covariate information.
    Schmidt S; Schmidt MA; Qin X; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 17934318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tree-based model for allele-sharing-based linkage analysis in human complex diseases.
    Xu W; Schulze TG; DePaulo JR; Bull SB; McMahon FJ; Greenwood CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 16385469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci: sib pairs or sibships?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 10782019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.