These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11754473)

  • 21. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The triangle test statistic (TTS): a test of genetic homogeneity using departure from the triangle constraints in IBD distribution among affected sib-pairs.
    Dizier MH; Quesneville H; Prum B; Selinger-Leneman H; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):433-42. PubMed ID: 11281281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of affected sib pairs, with covariates--with and without constraints.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Mar; 64(3):871-85. PubMed ID: 10053022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Covariate-based linkage analysis: application of a propensity score as the single covariate consistently improves power to detect linkage.
    Doan BQ; Sorant AJ; Frangakis CE; Bailey-Wilson JE; Shugart YY
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Sep; 14(9):1018-26. PubMed ID: 16736037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Log-linear models for gene mapping with affected sib pair data.
    Yang Y; Ott J
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12435886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robustness and power of the maximum-likelihood-binomial and maximum-likelihood-score methods, in multipoint linkage analysis of affected-sibship data.
    Abel L; Müller-Myhsok B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Aug; 63(2):638-47. PubMed ID: 9683590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing whether an allele can account in part for a linkage signal: the Genotype-IBD Sharing Test (GIST).
    Li C; Scott LJ; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Mar; 74(3):418-31. PubMed ID: 14872409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interpreting analyses of continuous covariates in affected sibling pair linkage studies.
    Schmidt S; Qin X; Schmidt MA; Martin ER; Hauser ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):541-52. PubMed ID: 17410529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Search for a gene x environment interaction: G x E hunt.
    Bailey JN; Suchard MA; Smalley SL; Sinsheimer JS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S491-6. PubMed ID: 10597481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.
    Kerber RA; Amos CI; Yeap BY; Finkelstein DM; Thomas DC
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():64. PubMed ID: 18616822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identifying susceptibility genes by using joint tests of association and linkage and accounting for epistasis.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S147. PubMed ID: 16451607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The score statistic of the LD-lod analysis: detecting linkage adaptive to linkage disequilibrium.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11474209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ASP--a simulation-based power calculator for genetic linkage studies of qualitative traits, using sib-pairs.
    Krawczak M
    Hum Genet; 2001 Dec; 109(6):675-7. PubMed ID: 11810280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of empirical p values from asymptotic p values for conditional logistic affected relative pair linkage analysis.
    Sinha M; Song Y; Elston RC; Olson JM; Goddard KA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 16612102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Incorporation of covariates into genome scanning using sib-pair analysis in bipolar affective disorder.
    Greenwood CM; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 9433555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.