These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11755448)

  • 1. Professional attitudes to Changing Childbirth in Nottingham, UK.
    Holroyd S; Bailey V; James V; Pitman A; Whynes DK
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2002 Feb; 39(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 11755448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Just an extra pair of hands'? A qualitative study of obstetric service users' and professionals' views towards 24/7 consultant presence on a single UK tertiary maternity unit.
    Reid HE; Wittkowski A; Vause S; Heazell AEP
    BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e019977. PubMed ID: 29511017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaboration of midwives in primary care midwifery practices with other maternity care providers.
    Warmelink JC; Wiegers TA; de Cock TP; Klomp T; Hutton EK
    Midwifery; 2017 Dec; 55():45-52. PubMed ID: 28926751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of the Midwife Profiling Questionnaire assessing women's preferred perinatal care professional and knowledge of midwives' legal competences.
    Vermeulen J; Peersman W; Quadvlieg L; Fobelets M; De Clercq G; Swinnen E; Beeckman K
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():23-32. PubMed ID: 29804771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus?
    Blais R; Maheux B; Lambert J; Loiselle J; Gauthier N; Framarin A
    CMAJ; 1994 Mar; 150(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 8313288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Midwives' attitudes towards supporting normal labour and birth - A cross-sectional study in South Germany.
    Zinsser LA; Stoll K; Gross MM
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():98-102. PubMed ID: 27321726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.
    Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S
    Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing midwifery practice through work-based learning: an exploratory study.
    Marshall JE
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 22749493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midwifery care in rural and remote British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes of rural parturient women with a midwife involved in their care, 2003 to 2008.
    Stoll K; Kornelsen J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 24588878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roles, risks, and responsibilities in maternity care: trainees' beliefs and the effects of practice obstetric training.
    Smith LF
    BMJ; 1992 Jun; 304(6842):1613-5. PubMed ID: 1628091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Professional attitudes towards normal childbirth in a shared care unit.
    Ruiz Mdel R; Limonero JT
    Midwifery; 2014 Jul; 30(7):817-24. PubMed ID: 23928211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of Midwifery - Obstetrics Collaboration (MOC) scale: A tool to improve collaborative practice.
    Onibokun OO; Morelli EM; Illuzzi JL; White MA
    Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102941. PubMed ID: 33618318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Playing nice: improving the professional climate between physicians and midwives in the Calgary area.
    Ratti J; Ross S; Stephanson K; Williamson T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jul; 36(7):590-597. PubMed ID: 25184977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives' burnout levels and professional attitudes: A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system.
    Dawson K; Newton M; Forster D; McLachlan H
    Midwifery; 2018 Aug; 63():60-67. PubMed ID: 29803988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. General practitioners' attitudes to the development of midwifery group practices.
    Fenwick N; Morgan M; McKenzie C; Wolfe C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Jul; 48(432):1395-8. PubMed ID: 9800397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variables That Influence US Midwife and Physician Management of the Third Stage of Labor.
    Schorn MN; Dietrich MS; Donaghey B; Minnick AF
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 63(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 29384593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-based news reports on midwives compared with obstetricians: a prospective analysis.
    Dahlen HG; Homer CS
    Birth; 2012 Mar; 39(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22369605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a quality care framework to evaluate user and provider experiences of maternity care: A comparative study.
    Symon A; McFadden A; White M; Fraser K; Cummins A
    Midwifery; 2019 Jun; 73():17-25. PubMed ID: 30856527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative exploration of how midwives' and obstetricians' perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth.
    Healy S; Humphreys E; Kennedy C
    Women Birth; 2017 Oct; 30(5):367-375. PubMed ID: 28279637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.
    Vedam S; Schummers L; Stoll K; Rogers J; Klein MC; Fairbrother N; Dharamsi S; Liston R; Chong GK; Kaczorowski J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 22925396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.