678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11756098)
21. Unenhanced spiral CT in acute ureteral colic: a replacement for excretory urography?
Ryu JA; Kim B; Jeon YH; Lee J; Lee JW; Jeon SS; Park KH
Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 11752964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Unenhanced helical CT of ureterolithiasis: value of the tissue rim sign.
Kawashima A; Sandler CM; Boridy IC; Takahashi N; Benson GS; Goldman SM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):997-1000. PubMed ID: 9124157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Longitudinal stone diameter on coronal reconstruction of computed tomography as a predictor of ureteral stone expulsion in medical expulsive therapy.
Lee SR; Jeon HG; Park DS; Choi YD
Urology; 2012 Oct; 80(4):784-9. PubMed ID: 22901820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ureteral Stone Diameter on Computerized Tomography Coronal Reconstructions Is Clinically Important and Under-reported.
Kadihasanoglu M; Marien T; Miller NL
Urology; 2017 Apr; 102():54-60. PubMed ID: 28089887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report.
Yoshida T; Inoue T; Taguchi M; Omura N; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):913-919. PubMed ID: 30155728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Spontaneous passage of ureteral stones in patients with indwelling ureteral stents.
Baumgarten L; Desai A; Shipman S; Eun DD; Pontari MA; Mydlo JH; Reese AC
Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9024-9029. PubMed ID: 28971791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic.
Moon YJ; Kim HW; Kim JB; Kim HJ; Chang YS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):717-21. PubMed ID: 26495073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive Factors for Spontaneous Stone Passage and the Potential Role of Serum C-Reactive Protein in Patients with 4 to 10 mm Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study.
Özcan C; Aydoğdu O; Senocak C; Damar E; Eraslan A; Oztuna D; Bozkurt OF
J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1009-13. PubMed ID: 25963189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of spontaneous ureteral stone passage: Automated 3D-measurements perform equal to radiologists, and linear measurements equal to volumetric.
Jendeberg J; Geijer H; Alshamari M; Lidén M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2474-2483. PubMed ID: 29368161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.
Selvi I; Baydilli N; Tokmak TT; Akinsal EC; Basar H
Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 32980972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Can noncontrast helical computed tomography replace intravenous urography for evaluation of patients with acute urinary tract colic?
Chen MY; Zagoria RJ
J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(2):299-303. PubMed ID: 10195491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Soft-tissue "rim" sign in the diagnosis of ureteral calculi with use of unenhanced helical CT.
Heneghan JP; Dalrymple NC; Verga M; Rosenfield AT; Smith RC
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):709-11. PubMed ID: 9051021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimation of size of distal ureteral stones: noncontrast CT scan versus actual size.
Kishore TA; Pedro RN; Hinck B; Monga M
Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):761-4. PubMed ID: 18701151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive value of secondary signs of obstruction in follow-up computed tomography of ureteral stones: a study with dynamic computed tomography.
Sahlén K; Dahlman P; Brekkan E; Lönnemark M; Sahlén G; Segelsjö M; Magnusson A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Feb; 52(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 29037128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation of ureteral stone measurements by CT and plain film radiography: utility of the KUB.
Katz D; McGahan JP; Gerscovich EO; Troxel SA; Low RK
J Endourol; 2003 Dec; 17(10):847-50. PubMed ID: 14744346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Can CT-Based Stone Impaction Markers Augment the Predictive Ability of Spontaneous Stone Passage?
Kachroo N; Jain R; Maskal S; Alshara L; Armanyous S; Milk J; Kahn L; Monga M; Sivalingam S
J Endourol; 2021 Apr; 35(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 32883100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiologic investigation of renal colic: unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography.
Sourtzis S; Thibeau JF; Damry N; Raslan A; Vandendris M; Bellemans M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1491-4. PubMed ID: 10350278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Unenhanced ultrafast computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain.
Pummangura N; Kochakarn W; Viseshsindh V; Pipatkulsawat K; Wibulpolprasert B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Feb; 85(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 12081128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients.
Boulay I; Holtz P; Foley WD; White B; Begun FP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1485-90. PubMed ID: 10350277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education.
Miller OF; Kane CJ
J Urol; 1999 Sep; 162(3 Pt 1):688-90; discussion 690-1. PubMed ID: 10458343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
