198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11757012)
1. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Haug RH; Peterson GP; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Jan; 60(1):73-80; discussion 80-1. PubMed ID: 11757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures.
Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates.
Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques for reconstructing atrophic edentulous mandible fractures.
Madsen MJ; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 16487809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical evaluation of mandibular angle fracture plating techniques.
Haug RH; Fattahi TT; Goltz M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 59(10):1199-210. PubMed ID: 11573182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plate osteosynthesis of the mandibular condyle.
Lauer G; Haim D; Proff P; Richter G; Pradel W; Fanghänel J; Pilling E; Gedrange T; Mai R
Ann Anat; 2007; 189(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 17696004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical study of the Delta plate and the TriLock Delta condyle trauma plate.
Haim D; Müller A; Leonhardt H; Nowak A; Richter G; Lauer G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 69(10):2619-25. PubMed ID: 21474224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development plates for stable internal fixation: Study of mechanical resistance in simulated fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Celegatti Filho TS; Rodrigues DC; Lauria A; Moreira RW; Consani S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):158-61. PubMed ID: 25439088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-dimensional finite-element analysis investigating the biomechanical behavior of the mandible and plate osteosynthesis in cases of fractures of the condylar process.
Wagner A; Krach W; Schicho K; Undt G; Ploder O; Ewers R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Dec; 94(6):678-86. PubMed ID: 12464890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vitro comparison of mechanical resistance between two straight plates and a Y-plate for fixation of mandibular condyle fractures.
de Souza GM; Rodrigues DC; Celegatti Filho TS; Moreira RWF; Falci SGM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 46(1):168-172. PubMed ID: 29208487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques.
Choi BH; Kim KN; Kim HJ; Kim MK
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 27(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 10342148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures.
Tominaga K; Habu M; Khanal A; Mimori Y; Yoshioka I; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1510-6. PubMed ID: 16982310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of the mechanical resistance of 2 separate plates and 2 overlaid plates used in the fixation of the mandibular condyle: an in vitro study.
Gealh WC; Costa JV; Ferreira GM; Iwaki Filho L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):738-43. PubMed ID: 19304028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques for fixing mandibular angle fractures: the introduction of a new 3D plate approach.
Kalfarentzos EF; Deligianni D; Mitros G; Tyllianakis M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 13(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 19636597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Evaluation of Mandibular Condyle Fracture Osteosynthesis Using the Rhombic Three-Dimensional Condylar Fracture Plate.
Ben Achour A; Meißner H; Teicher U; Haim D; Range U; Brosius A; Leonhardt H; Lauer G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 77(9):1868.e1-1868.e15. PubMed ID: 31112678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative in vitro mechanical evaluation of techniques using a 2.0 mm locking fixation system for simulated fractures of the mandibular body.
de Medeiros RC; de Moura AL; Sawazaki R; Fernandes Moreira RW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 43(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 25573304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
