These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11757575)

  • 1. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reverse osmosis filtration for space mission wastewater: membrane properties and operating conditions.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Feb; 182(1-2):77-90. PubMed ID: 11594378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a reverse osmosis membrane system for recycling space mission wastewater.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 2000; 7(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 11676440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the influence of temperature on degree of concentration polarization in reverse osmosis systems.
    Agashichev SP
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):319-26. PubMed ID: 16003992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
    Zhou W; Song L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High performance RO membranes for desalination and wastewater reclamation and their operation results.
    Henmi M; Fusaoka Y; Tomioka H; Kurihara M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2134-40. PubMed ID: 21045342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes.
    Hoek EM; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(24):5581-8. PubMed ID: 14717167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type.
    Kumar M; Adham SS; Pearce WR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Mar; 40(6):2037-44. PubMed ID: 16570633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
    Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
    Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low cost reclamation using the Advanced Integrated Wastewater Pond Systems Technology and reverse osmosis.
    Downing JB; Bracco E; Green FB; Ku AY; Lundquist TJ; Zubieta IX; Oswald WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 11833725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatability of organic fractions derived from secondary effluent by reverse osmosis membrane.
    Hu JY; Ong SL; Shan JH; Kang JB; Ng WJ
    Water Res; 2003 Nov; 37(19):4801-9. PubMed ID: 14568067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of reverse osmosis membranes to remove perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from semiconductor wastewater.
    Tang CY; Fu QS; Robertson AP; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Dec; 40(23):7343-9. PubMed ID: 17180987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of reverse osmosis membrane age on rejection of NDMA precursors and formation of NDMA in finished water after full advanced treatment for potable reuse.
    Roback SL; Ishida KP; Plumlee MH
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():120-131. PubMed ID: 31170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.