These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11757929)

  • 1. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative rates of growth of annoyance of impulsive and non-impulsive noises.
    Fidell S; Silvati L; Pearsons K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 2):576-85. PubMed ID: 11837963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.
    Vos J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3330-45. PubMed ID: 1619113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penalty for impulse noise, derived from annoyance ratings for impulse and road-traffic sounds.
    Vos J; Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 3973214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the assessment of shooting sounds: loudness-level weightings versus A- and C-weighted sound exposure levels (L).
    Vosa J; Geurtsen FW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):1729-32. PubMed ID: 14587574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proposed criteria for assessing low frequency noise annoyance in occupational settings.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Szymczak W; Dudarewicz A; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2006; 19(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 17252670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Annoyance and discomfort during exposure to high-frequency noise from an ultrasonic washer.
    Holmberg K; Landström U; Nordström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):819-27. PubMed ID: 8668439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
    Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.
    Guoqing D; Xiaoyi L; Xiang S; Zhengguang L; Qili L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(57):52-7. PubMed ID: 22517304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectro-temporal weighting of loudness.
    Oberfeld D; Heeren W; Rennies J; Verhey J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e50184. PubMed ID: 23209670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure.
    Fidell S; Mestre V; Schomer P; Berry B; Gjestland T; Vallet M; Reid T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):791-806. PubMed ID: 21877795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The subjective effect of low frequency content in road traffic noise.
    Torija AJ; Flindell IH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):189-98. PubMed ID: 25618050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indoor human response to blast sounds that generate rattles.
    Schomer PD; Averbuch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):665-73. PubMed ID: 2768676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.