135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11758297)
1. Quality assurance for screening mammography data collection systems in 22 countries.
Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Broeders M; Thoresen S; Rodrigues VJ; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(4):528-41. PubMed ID: 11758297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
Brown ML; Houn F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer--screening data for assessing quality of services--New York, 2000-2003.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2004 Jun; 53(21):455-7. PubMed ID: 15175570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries.
Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Taplin S; Thoresen S; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R;
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Dec; 14(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 12515331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A screening mammography program. Staying alive and making it work.
Monsees BS; Destouet JM
Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 1732928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Men's and women's knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer and mammography screening.
Chamot E; Perneger TV
Prev Med; 2002 Mar; 34(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 11902856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening--the European experience.
Perry NM
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2004; 49(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15633481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjusting mammography--audit recommendations in a lower-incidence Taiwanese population.
Chen CY; Tzeng WS; Tsai CC; Mak CW; Chen CH; Chou MC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Sep; 5(9):978-85. PubMed ID: 18755438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: can it be done?
Yankaskas BC; Klabunde CN; Ancelle-Park R; Renner G; Wang H; Fracheboud J; Pou G; Bulliard JL;
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 15624239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs.
Zapka JG; Geller BM; Bulliard JL; Fracheboud J; Sancho-Garnier H; Ballard-Barbash R;
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):126-37. PubMed ID: 16962910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
Miles A; Cockburn J; Smith RA; Wardle J
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5 Suppl):1201-13. PubMed ID: 15316915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000.
Sarkeala T; Anttila A; Forsman H; Luostarinen T; Saarenmaa I; Hakama M
Eur J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 40(14):2116-25. PubMed ID: 15341987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
