102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11758577)
1. Originator drug development.
Findlay RJ
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 11758577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Striking the right balance between innovation and drug price competition: understanding the Hatch-Waxman Act--an introduction of speakers.
Rea TS
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 11759713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Policy on 180-day marketing exclusivity for drugs marketed under abbreviated new drug applications; clarification--FDA. Clarification.
Fed Regist; 1997 Nov; 62(229):63268-9. PubMed ID: 10177950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug marketing exclusivity under United States and European Union law.
Junod V
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(4):479-518. PubMed ID: 15875347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Generics battle brand names over mortality of drug patents.
Betz R
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Jul; 13(7):35-7. PubMed ID: 10144008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A generic problem.
Hanauer SB
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):649. PubMed ID: 17130869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Staving off death: a case study of the pharmaceutical industry's strategies to protect blockbuster franchises.
Gorlin DI
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(4):823-64. PubMed ID: 19601385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984: fine-tuning the balance between the interests of pioneer and generic drug manufacturers.
Soehnge H
Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 12739584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
Paine CS
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. White paper. The five myths of generic competition. A Pharma Matters report. March 2009.
Drug News Perspect; 2009 Apr; 22(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 19440560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential pathways for abbreviated approval of generic biologics under existing law and proposed reforms to the law.
Dinh TQ
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):77-137. PubMed ID: 17444027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Food and Drug Administration and patent law at a crossroads: the listing of polymorph patents as a barrier to generic drug entry.
Srivastava D
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(2):339-54. PubMed ID: 15298015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Branded drug reformulation: the next brand vs. generic antitrust battleground.
Amoresano GV
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 17444032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks.
Balto DA
Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. FDA's role in making exclusivity determinations.
Dickinson EH
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 11758573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Issues in the interpretation of 180-day exclusivity.
Lietzan E; Korn DE
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 17444026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of generic substitution on price competition in Finland.
Aalto-Setälä V
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 May; 9(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17508226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Discount for only one drug of the same group leads to impaired health care quality].
Bergström R
Lakartidningen; 2006 Feb 8-14; 103(6):387-8; discussion 388. PubMed ID: 16536044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The new drug war.
Sherrid P
US News World Rep; 2002 Dec; 133(21):41. PubMed ID: 12503485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing of patent filing and market exclusivity.
Dunn MK
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2011 Jul; 10(7):487-8. PubMed ID: 21720399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
