126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11758946)
1. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study.
Oda K; Toyama H; Uemura K; Ikoma Y; Kimura Y; Senda M
Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation and evaluation of an ordered subsets reconstruction algorithm for transmission PET studies using median root prior and inter-update median filtering.
Bettinardi V; Alenius S; Numminen P; Teräs M; Gilardi MC; Fazio F; Ruotsalainen U
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb; 30(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 12552340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. OS-EM and FBP reconstructions at low count rates: effect on 3D PET studies of [11C] WAY-100635.
Bélanger MJ; Mann JJ; Parsey RV
Neuroimage; 2004 Jan; 21(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 14741662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postinjection transmission scanning in myocardial 18F-FDG PET studies using both filtered backprojection and iterative reconstruction.
van der Weerdt AP; Boellaard R; Knaapen P; Visser CA; Lammertsma AA; Visser FC
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 14960632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
Morimoto T; Ito H; Takano A; Ikoma Y; Seki C; Okauchi T; Tanimoto K; Ando A; Shiraishi T; Yamaya T; Suhara T
Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16715957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions of (18)F-FDG PET.
Etchebehere EC; Macapinlac HA; Gonen M; Humm K; Yeung HW; Akhurst T; Scher HI; Larson SM
Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 12114875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise and signal decoupling in maximum-likelihood reconstructions and Metz filters for PET brain images.
Liow JS; Strother SC
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Apr; 39(4):735-50. PubMed ID: 15552081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.
Frese T; Rouze NC; Bouman CA; Sauer K; Hutchins GD
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 12716002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography based on median root prior.
Alenius S; Ruotsalainen U
Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 24(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 9143462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps.
Delbeke D; Martin WH; Patton JA; Sandler MP
Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 11152796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the number of sampling step angles in SPECT Images: comparison between FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithms].
Kiguchi M; Taniguchi K; Akiyama Y; Furukawa T; Kushima T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jul; 60(7):1009-17. PubMed ID: 15340283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative comparison of analytic and iterative reconstruction methods in 2- and 3-dimensional dynamic cardiac 18F-FDG PET.
Lubberink M; Boellaard R; van der Weerdt AP; Visser FC; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2004 Dec; 45(12):2008-15. PubMed ID: 15585474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attenuation correction in whole-body FDG oncological studies: the role of statistical reconstruction.
Lonneux M; Borbath I; Bol A; Coppens A; Sibomana M; Bausart R; Defrise M; Pauwels S; Michel C
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Jun; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 10369944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
