123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11759208)
1. [Diagnostic importance of the sonographic scoring system in differentiating between malignant and benign ovarian tumors].
Durdević S
Med Pregl; 2001; 54(3-4):161-5. PubMed ID: 11759208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of endosonography scoring systems in the detection of ovarian and endometrial carcinoma.
Djurdjevic S; Stojanovic S; Kopitovic V; Hadnadjev D; Basta-Nikolic M
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19373954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new sonomorphologic scoring-system (Mainz score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part II: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer in postmenopausal women.
Weber G; Merz E; Bahlmann F; Leber AM
Ultraschall Med; 1999 Feb; 20(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10226339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new sonomorphologic scoring system (Mainz Score) for the assessment of ovarian tumors using transvaginal ultrasonography. Part I: A comparison between the scoring-system and the assessment by an experienced sonographer.
Merz E; Weber G; Bahlmann F; Kiesslich R
Ultraschall Med; 1998 Jun; 19(3):99-107. PubMed ID: 9744040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of the development and application of the sonographic scoring system: differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
Jiang ZH; Li KT; Tian JW; Ren M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 293(2):303-10. PubMed ID: 26576768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study.
Ferrazzi E; Zanetta G; Dordoni D; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Lissoni AA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 10(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 9339526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the five sonographic morphology scoring systems for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumors.
Klangsin S; Suntharasaj T; Suwanrath C; Kor-Anantakul O; Prasartwanakit V
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 24192793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonographic morphological pattern in the pre-operative prediction of ovarian masses.
Benjapibal M; Sunsaneevitayakul P; Phatihattakorn C; Suphanit I; Iamurairat W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Apr; 86(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 12757077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumor.
Wanapirak C; Nimitwongsakul S; Tongsong T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jan; 84(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 11281497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian tumours by ultrasonography.
Tuladhar AS; Pradhan S
Nepal Med Coll J; 2005 Dec; 7(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 16519078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ultrasound score, CA125, menopausal status, and risk of malignancy index in differentiating between benign and borderline or malignant ovarian tumors.
Leelahakorn S; Tangjitgamol S; Manusirivithaya S; Thongsuksai P; Jaroenchainon P; Jivangkul C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S22-30. PubMed ID: 17718292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New sonographic morphology score for the differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
Shen ZY; He AQ; Xia GL; Wu MF; Li J; Ding YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1000-12. PubMed ID: 27125323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic morphology scores (SMS) for differentiation between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Wanapirak C; Srisupundit K; Tongsong T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(3):407-10. PubMed ID: 17059332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiating malignant from benign ovarian tumors with transvaginal color flow imaging.
Weiner Z; Thaler I; Beck D; Rottem S; Deutsch M; Brandes JM
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Feb; 79(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 1731278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A morphology index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer.
DePriest PD; Shenson D; Fried A; Hunter JE; Andrews SJ; Gallion HH; Pavlik EJ; Kryscio RJ; van Nagell JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Oct; 51(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8244178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy.
Sassone AM; Timor-Tritsch IE; Artner A; Westhoff C; Warren WB
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jul; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 2047071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Studies on angiogenesis in the benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms with the use of color and pulsed Doppler sonography and serum CA-125, CA-19.9, CA-72.4 and vascular endothelial growth factor measurements.
Czekierdowski A
Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2002; 57(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 12898913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
