These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11759463)

  • 1. The practice accreditation and improvement survey (PAIS). What patients think.
    Greco M; Sweeney K; Brownlea A; McGovern J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2001 Nov; 30(11):1096-100. PubMed ID: 11759463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice.
    Mercer SW; McConnachie A; Maxwell M; Heaney D; Watt GC
    Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 15772120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ['Consumer quality'-index 'General practice care' measures patients' experiences and compares general practices with each other].
    Meuwissen LE; de Bakker DH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A180. PubMed ID: 19900331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A practical approach to quality improvement: the experience of the RNZCGP practice standards validation field trial.
    Gillon M; Buetow S; Wellingham J; Talboys S;
    N Z Med J; 2003 Nov; 116(1186):U682. PubMed ID: 14657965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National standards for general practice.
    Booth B; Hays R; Douglas K
    Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Dec; 27(12):1107-9. PubMed ID: 9919733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' evaluation of quality of care in general practice: what are the cultural and linguistic barriers?
    Harmsen JA; Bernsen RM; Bruijnzeels MA; Meeuwesen L
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Jul; 72(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 18485657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of procedural rural medical practice in Australia.
    Hays RB; Evans RJ; Veitch C
    Rural Remote Health; 2005; 5(4):474. PubMed ID: 16218772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ).
    Jaturapatporn D; Hathirat S; Manataweewat B; Dellow AC; Leelaharattanarak S; Sirimothya S; Dellow J; Udomsubpayakul U
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1491-6. PubMed ID: 17100390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The voice of the patient: a national, representative study of satisfaction with family physicians.
    Wolosin RJ
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2005; 14(3):155-64. PubMed ID: 16027593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General practitioner attitudes to the care of people with epilepsy: an examination of clustering within practices and prediction of patient-rated quality of care.
    Thapar AK; Roland MO
    BMC Fam Pract; 2005 Mar; 6(1):9. PubMed ID: 15740630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Patient survey in general practice: development, validation and application of a survey instrument].
    Nübling M; Mühlbacher A; Niebling W
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Jun; 98(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 15295933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' quality assessment of ambulatory obstetric and gynaecological services.
    Bojar I; Wdowiak L; Ostrowski T
    Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2005; 50():319-21. PubMed ID: 16358992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study.
    Durieux P; Bissery A; Dubois S; Gasquet I; Coste J
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2004 Jun; 13(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 15175490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between family doctors' practices characteristics and patient evaluation of care.
    Klemenc-Ketis Z; Petek D; Kersnik J
    Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 106(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 22583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forty-eight hour access to primary care: practice factors predicting patients' perceptions.
    Campbell JL; Ramsay J; Green J; Harvey K
    Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 15778237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient Experience of Australian General Practices.
    Narayanan A; Greco M
    Big Data; 2016 Mar; 4(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27441583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saying 'goodbye' to single-handed practices; what do patients and staff lose or gain?
    van den Hombergh P; Engels Y; van den Hoogen H; van Doremalen J; van den Bosch W; Grol R
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15640293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Patients' evaluations as quality measurements in general practice].
    Heje HN; Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(46):5386-9. PubMed ID: 12469385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consultations in general practice and at an Aboriginal community controlled health service: do they differ?
    Larkins SL; Geia LK; Panaretto KS
    Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(3):560. PubMed ID: 16863398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.