337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11759713)
1. Striking the right balance between innovation and drug price competition: understanding the Hatch-Waxman Act--an introduction of speakers.
Rea TS
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 11759713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Striking the right balance between innovation and drug price competition: putting the Hatch-Waxman Act into perspective.
Deal JB
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 11759712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984: fine-tuning the balance between the interests of pioneer and generic drug manufacturers.
Soehnge H
Food Drug Law J; 2003; 58(1):51-80. PubMed ID: 12739584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Hatch-Waxman Act: balancing competing interests or survival of the fittest?
Behrendt KE
Food Drug Law J; 2002; 57(2):247-71. PubMed ID: 12436990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protecting the balance of Hatch-Waxman: understanding the industry's new dynamics for the 21st century.
Schroeder RG; Papas P
Food Drug Law J; 2001; 56(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 11942348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Unsettling drug patent settlements: a framework for presumptive illegality.
Carrier MA
Mich Law Rev; 2009 Oct; 108(1):37-80. PubMed ID: 20535881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Policy on 180-day marketing exclusivity for drugs marketed under abbreviated new drug applications; clarification--FDA. Clarification.
Fed Regist; 1997 Nov; 62(229):63268-9. PubMed ID: 10177950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The emerging effects of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984.
Lewis RA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():361-78. PubMed ID: 10118987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The balance between innovation and competition: the Hatch-Waxman Act, the 2003 Amendments, and beyond.
Kelly C
Food Drug Law J; 2011; 66(3):417-78, iii. PubMed ID: 24505856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A generic problem.
Hanauer SB
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):649. PubMed ID: 17130869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ongoing regulation of generic drugs.
Frank RG
N Engl J Med; 2007 Nov; 357(20):1993-6. PubMed ID: 18003956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Overview of the Hatch-Waxman Act and its impact on the drug development process.
Mossinghoff GJ
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 11758572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Generics battle brand names over mortality of drug patents.
Betz R
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1995 Jul; 13(7):35-7. PubMed ID: 10144008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An Administrative Meter Maid: Using Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review to Curb Exclusivity Parking via the "Failure to Market" Provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act.
Apel BT
Mich Law Rev; 2015; 114(1):107-36. PubMed ID: 26394458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Old drugs, new uses: solving a Hatch-Waxman patent predicament.
McPhie DC
Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 15190929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Delaying generic competition--corporate payoffs and the future of Plavix.
Shuchman M
N Engl J Med; 2006 Sep; 355(13):1297-300. PubMed ID: 17005945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Brand-name drug manufacturers risk antitrust violations by slowing generic production through patent layering.
Paine CS
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):479-510. PubMed ID: 12715807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Originator drug development.
Findlay RJ
Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 11758577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Correcting Hatch-Waxman.
Fernandes M
Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(3):902-3; author reply 903. PubMed ID: 18475000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Noerr-Pennington immunity still a viable defense against antitrust claims arising from Hatch-Waxman litigation?
Steinhauer EH
Food Drug Law J; 2006; 61(4):679-700. PubMed ID: 17180769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
