These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11760132)

  • 1. Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.
    Strayer DL; Johnston WA
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Nov; 12(6):462-6. PubMed ID: 11760132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response.
    Consiglio W; Driscoll P; Witte M; Berg WP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2003 Jul; 35(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 12729813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.
    Drews FA; Pasupathi M; Strayer DL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):392-400. PubMed ID: 19102621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers.
    Strayer DL; Drews FA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 15709326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck.
    Kunar MA; Carter R; Cohen M; Horowitz TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 19001580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blocking-out auditory distracters while driving: A cognitive strategy to reduce task-demands on the road.
    Unal AB; Platteel S; Steg L; Epstude K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():934-42. PubMed ID: 22882879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.
    Beede KE; Kass SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 16310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conversation disrupts change detection in complex traffic scenes.
    McCarley JS; Vais MJ; Pringle H; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(3):424-36. PubMed ID: 15573543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak.
    Just MA; Keller TA; Cynkar J
    Brain Res; 2008 Apr; 1205():70-80. PubMed ID: 18353285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile.
    Strayer DL; Turrill J; Cooper JM; Coleman JR; Medeiros-Ward N; Biondi F
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1300-24. PubMed ID: 26534847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech shadowing while driving: on the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear.
    Spence C; Read L
    Psychol Sci; 2003 May; 14(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12741749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age and distraction by telephone conversation in task performance: implications for use of cellular telephones while driving.
    Lyda L; Osborne VM; Coleman P; Rienzi B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):391-4. PubMed ID: 12027328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
    Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving.
    Shinar D; Tractinsky N; Compton R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 15667818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver.
    Strayer DL; Drews FA; Crouch DJ
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):381-91. PubMed ID: 16884056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance.
    Rakauskas ME; Gugerty LJ; Ward NJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 15474548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hands-free versus hand-held cell phone conversation on a braking response by young drivers.
    Hendrick JL; Switzer JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Oct; 105(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 18065072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Text messaging during simulated driving.
    Drews FA; Yazdani H; Godfrey CN; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    Hum Factors; 2009 Oct; 51(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 20196300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of remote and in-person verbal interactions on verbalization rates and attention to dynamic spatial scenes.
    Gugerty L; Rakauskas M; Brooks J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Nov; 36(6):1029-43. PubMed ID: 15350880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.