126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11760839)
1. Measurement of midfemoral shaft geometry: repeatability and accuracy using magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Woodhead HJ; Kemp AF; Blimkie CJR ; Briody JN; Duncan CS; Thompson M; Lam A; Howman-Giles R; Cowell CT
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Dec; 16(12):2251-9. PubMed ID: 11760839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural Parameters of the Proximal Femur by 3-Dimensional Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Software: Comparison With Quantitative Computed Tomography.
Clotet J; Martelli Y; Di Gregorio S; Del Río Barquero LM; Humbert L
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(4):550-562. PubMed ID: 28624339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The contribution of cortical and cancellous bone to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the female proximal femur.
Lundeen GA; Knecht SL; Vajda EG; Bloebaum RD; Hofmann AA
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 11315237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.
Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; de Bakker PM; Liu D; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Oxland TR; McKay HA
Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1539-45. PubMed ID: 16847586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom.
Khoo BC; Beck TJ; Brown K; Price RI
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Sep; 36(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 23836197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femur segmentation in DXA imaging using a machine learning decision tree.
Hussain D; Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Han SM; Kim TS
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(5):727-746. PubMed ID: 30056442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials.
Khoo BC; Beck TJ; Qiao QH; Parakh P; Semanick L; Prince RL; Singer KP; Price RI
Bone; 2005 Jul; 37(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 15869917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.
Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of magnetic resonance imaging findings of degenerative disease on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in middle-aged men.
Donescu OS; Battié MC; Videman T
Acta Radiol; 2007 Mar; 48(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 17354141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital image analysis protocol for determining the radiocarpal joint space in the rheumatoid arthritic wrist.
Wilkinson SJ; Naylor A; Goh KL
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Oct; 89():127-134. PubMed ID: 28800441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.
Kolta S; Le Bras A; Mitton D; Bousson V; de Guise JA; Fechtenbaum J; Laredo JD; Roux C; Skalli W
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):969-76. PubMed ID: 15599494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of micro-CT to evaluate cortical bone geometry and strength in nude rats: correlation with mechanical testing, pQCT and DXA.
Bagi CM; Hanson N; Andresen C; Pero R; Lariviere R; Turner CH; Laib A
Bone; 2006 Jan; 38(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 16301011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The human patellar tendon moment arm assessed in vivo using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Erskine RM; Morse CI; Day SH; Williams AG; Onambele-Pearson GL
J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1294-8. PubMed ID: 24612717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo assessment of architecture and micro-finite element analysis derived indices of mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the radius.
Newitt DC; Majumdar S; van Rietbergen B; von Ingersleben G; Harris ST; Genant HK; Chesnut C; Garnero P; MacDonald B
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jan; 13(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 11878456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limited diagnostic agreement of quantitative sonography of the radius and phalanges with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine, femur, and radius for diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Krestan CR; Grampp S; Henk C; Peloschek P; Imhof H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 15333350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons between fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, underwater weighing and magnetic resonance imaging in healthy women.
Tothill P; Han TS; Avenell A; McNeill G; Reid DM
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 50(11):747-52. PubMed ID: 8933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the precision of two vertebral morphometry programs for the lunar EXPERT-XL imaging densitometer.
Harvey SB; Hutchison KM; Rennie EC; Hukins DW; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):388-98. PubMed ID: 9659132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of bone geometry and cortical density at the mid-femur between prepuberty and young adulthood using magnetic resonance imaging.
Högler W; Blimkie CJ; Cowell CT; Kemp AF; Briody J; Wiebe P; Farpour-Lambert N; Duncan CS; Woodhead HJ
Bone; 2003 Nov; 33(5):771-8. PubMed ID: 14623052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is also an accurate and precise method to measure the dimensions of human long bones.
Sievänen H; Kannus P; Oja P; Vuori I
Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Feb; 54(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 8012864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo measurement of human body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Thomsen TK; Jensen VJ; Henriksen MG
Eur J Surg; 1998 Feb; 164(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9537721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
