These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11761035)

  • 21. Evidencing inhibitory deficits in Alzheimer's disease through interference effects and shifting disabilities in the Stroop test.
    Amieva H; Lafont S; Rouch-Leroyer I; Rainville C; Dartigues JF; Orgogozo JM; Fabrigoule C
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 19(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 15288332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.
    Dulaney CL; Rogers WA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Mar; 20(2):470-84. PubMed ID: 8151280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anxiety-related Stroop interference in adolescents.
    Richards A; Richards LC; McGeeney A
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Jul; 127(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 10975428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ADHD and Stroop interference from age 9 to age 41 years: a meta-analysis of developmental effects.
    Schwartz K; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Med; 2008 Nov; 38(11):1607-16. PubMed ID: 18226285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stroop interference and food intake.
    Overduin J; Jansen A; Louwerse E
    Int J Eat Disord; 1995 Nov; 18(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 8556024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When the visual format of the color carrier word does and does not modulate the stroop effect.
    Blais C; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Dec; 33(8):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16615381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A problem in measuring the Stroop facilitation and interference effects: implications for measuring performance change in general.
    Chen JY
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):1059-70. PubMed ID: 8961342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Presenting two color words on a single Stroop trial: evidence for joint influence, not capture.
    MacLeod CM; Bors DA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):789-97. PubMed ID: 12219895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Color-word interference in relation to comparative compatibility: evidence for two sources of interference].
    Schulz T; Liebing D
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1991; 38(4):648-68. PubMed ID: 1785215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abnormal processing of irrelevant information in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Carter CS; Krener P; Chaderjian M; Northcutt C; Wolfe V
    Psychiatry Res; 1995 Jan; 56(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 7792343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Proofreaders' decreased Stroop interference.
    Borzoni S; Hines T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Jun; 82(3 Pt 2):1104-6. PubMed ID: 8823877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of stroop interference on the categorical perception of color.
    Wiggett JA; Davies IR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18426057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Double response to Stroop stimuli.
    Shimada H; Nakajima Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Oct; 73(2):571-4. PubMed ID: 1766788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 11495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stroop performance in depressive patients: a preliminary report.
    Markela-Lerenc J; Kaiser S; Fiedler P; Weisbrod M; Mundt C
    J Affect Disord; 2006 Aug; 94(1-3):261-7. PubMed ID: 16764940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.
    Fuentes LJ; Ortells JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Dec; 84(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 8128904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.
    Glaser MO; Glaser WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Dec; 8(6):875-94. PubMed ID: 6218237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
    Glaser WR; Glaser MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):13-42. PubMed ID: 2522504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-monitoring, need for cognition, and the Stroop effect: a preliminary study.
    Koch C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):212-4. PubMed ID: 12705528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.