These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11762253)

  • 21. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
    Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The basics and implementation of digital mammography.
    Zuley ML
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 20868892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer: an overview.
    Van Ongeval Ch
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 17696081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contrast enhancement in dense breast images to aid clustered microcalcifications detection.
    Nunes FL; Schiabel H; Goes CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Mar; 20(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 16820957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital mammography: state of the art.
    Gater L
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 73(5):445-57; quiz 458-60. PubMed ID: 12048983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FDA approves system for digital mammography.
    White J
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Mar; 92(6):442. PubMed ID: 10716954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Results of a survey on digital screening mammography: prevalence, efficiency, and use of ancillary diagnostic AIDS.
    Haygood TM; Whitman GJ; Atkinson EN; Nikolova RG; Sandoval SY; Dempsey PJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 18359447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital Imaging of the Breast: Is a Synthetic View Better?
    Jenks S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 27038116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75. PubMed ID: 10623317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Initial clinical experiences with digital full-field mammography].
    Grebe S; Diekmann F; Bick U; Paepke S; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(11):589-94. PubMed ID: 11127776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening].
    Kido C
    Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances.
    Tang J; Rangayyan RM; Xu J; El Naqa I; Yang Y
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 Mar; 13(2):236-51. PubMed ID: 19171527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Berzeg S; Bick U; Fischer T; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 12811688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conversion to digital mammography in a private practice.
    Destounis S; Morgan R; Arieno A; Demay S; Kissel D
    Semin Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 21134525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
    Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms.
    Undrill PE; O'Kane AD; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Oct; 55(10):782-90. PubMed ID: 11052880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.