These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11762254)

  • 21. Mammography processor quality assurance.
    Monda LA
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(1):46-68; quiz 69-72. PubMed ID: 12362534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Functional properties of diagnostic ultrasound instruments. A concept of trial building blocks for implementing quality assurance].
    Trier HG
    Ultraschall Med; 1994 Oct; 15(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 7801092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mammography quality assurance.
    Zinninger MD
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1992; 47(5):155-7, 164. PubMed ID: 1460217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Quality control in mammography].
    Stöffler G
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():48-53. PubMed ID: 3705126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Quality assurance of medical technical equipment].
    Sjølie K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 Jan; 111(3):298-9. PubMed ID: 2000605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mammogram results in ambulatory care--a mammography quality circle in Braunschweig, Germany, between 1998 and 2001].
    Derra M; Green E; Hintner H; Hübler R; Sabih S; Thieme H; Wezler U; Robra BP; Swart E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2004 Aug; 98(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 15487384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Field 4. Environmental safety practice in the intensive care unit. French-speaking Society of Intensive Care. French Society of Anesthesia and Resuscitation].
    Fougère S; Beydon L; Saulnier F
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2008 Oct; 27(10):e71-6. PubMed ID: 18952403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mammography improves under MQSA oversight.
    Elliott ML; Houn F
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Jun; 20(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 10180982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monitoring mammographic performance.
    Dewerd L
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Sep; 9(9):43-4, 47-8. PubMed ID: 10107656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control.
    Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Wisconsin mammography quality assurance program.
    Bunge M; Zvara JA; Remington PL
    Wis Med J; 1990 Sep; 89(9):527-8. PubMed ID: 2238690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mammography quality assurance in Washington State.
    Frost F; Taylor V; Odlaug M
    Health Phys; 1992 Feb; 62(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 1730554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality assurance in mammography: artifact analysis.
    Hogge JP; Palmer CH; Muller CC; Little ST; Smith DC; Fatouros PP; de Paredes ES
    Radiographics; 1999; 19(2):503-22. PubMed ID: 10194792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Indovina P; Candini G
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Bavarian mammography screening: results of consistency tests in X-ray units over three months].
    Blendl C; Klug A; Lohmann R; Moll C; Schädlich J; Blaser D
    Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1157-66. PubMed ID: 15346292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program.
    Craig AR; Heggie JC; McLean ID; Coakley KS; Nicoll JJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2001 Sep; 24(3):107-31. PubMed ID: 11764394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Practices of radiotherapy equipment quality control in radiotherapy centres in Croatia.
    Svabić M; Jurković S; Faj D; Kasabasić M; Smilović Radojcić D; Ivković A
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Oct; 32 Suppl 2():217-9. PubMed ID: 19138027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.