BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11762481)

  • 1. Use of electronic noses for detection of odour from animal production facilities: a review.
    Nimmermark S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):33-41. PubMed ID: 11762481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new intelligent electronic nose system for measuring and analysing livestock and poultry farm odours.
    Pan L; Yang SX
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Dec; 135(1-3):399-408. PubMed ID: 17385056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensor arrays: an inspired idea or an objective measurement of environmental odours?
    Stuetz RM; Nicolas J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):53-8. PubMed ID: 11762483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the dynamics of the odour release from a pig house, using an electronic odour sensor.
    Gallmann E; Hartung E; Brose G; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):101-8. PubMed ID: 15484748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring of biological odour filtration in closed environments with olfactometry and an electronic nose.
    Willers H; de Gijsel P; Ogink N; D'Amico A; Martinelli E; Di Natale C; van Ras N; van der Waarde J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):93-100. PubMed ID: 15484747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Continuous monitoring of odours from a composting plant using electronic noses.
    Sironi S; Capelli L; Céntola P; Del Rosso R; Il Grande M
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 16574395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in artificial olfaction: sensors and applications.
    Gutiérrez J; Horrillo MC
    Talanta; 2014 Jun; 124():95-105. PubMed ID: 24767451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental odours assessment from waste treatment plants: dynamic olfactometry in combination with sensorial analysers "electronic noses".
    Littarru P
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 16766175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need for electronic noses for environmental odour exposure assessment.
    Capelli L; Dentoni L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 24434979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odour detection methods: olfactometry and chemical sensors.
    Brattoli M; de Gennaro G; de Pinto V; Loiotile AD; Lovascio S; Penza M
    Sensors (Basel); 2011; 11(5):5290-322. PubMed ID: 22163901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of Electronic Noses from Research Objects to Engineered Environmental Odour Monitoring Systems: A Review of Standardization Approaches.
    Cipriano D; Capelli L
    Biosensors (Basel); 2019 May; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 31159226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A 21st century technique for food control: electronic noses.
    Peris M; Escuder-Gilabert L
    Anal Chim Acta; 2009 Apr; 638(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 19298873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of odour emissions from animal housing systems with low ammonia emission.
    Ogink NW; Koerkamp PW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):245-52. PubMed ID: 11762469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Odour influence on well-being and health with specific focus on animal production emissions.
    Nimmermark S
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2004; 11(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 15627320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an electronic nose for environmental odour monitoring.
    Dentoni L; Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Zanetti S; Della Torre M
    Sensors (Basel); 2012 Oct; 12(11):14363-81. PubMed ID: 23202165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Odour impact from farms with animal husbandry and biogas facilities.
    Keck M; Mager K; Weber K; Keller M; Frei M; Steiner B; Schrade S
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():1432-1443. PubMed ID: 30248865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic noses for environmental monitoring applications.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R
    Sensors (Basel); 2014 Oct; 14(11):19979-20007. PubMed ID: 25347583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different Ways to Apply a Measurement Instrument of E-Nose Type to Evaluate Ambient Air Quality with Respect to Odour Nuisance in a Vicinity of Municipal Processing Plants.
    Szulczyński B; Wasilewski T; Wojnowski W; Majchrzak T; Dymerski T; Namieśnik J; Gębicki J
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Nov; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 29156597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems.
    Franke W; Frechen FB; Giebel S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19448306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.