BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11762484)

  • 1. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of the dynamics of the odour release from a pig house, using an electronic odour sensor.
    Gallmann E; Hartung E; Brose G; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):101-8. PubMed ID: 15484748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of electronic noses for detection of odour from animal production facilities: a review.
    Nimmermark S
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):33-41. PubMed ID: 11762481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensor arrays: an inspired idea or an objective measurement of environmental odours?
    Stuetz RM; Nicolas J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):53-8. PubMed ID: 11762483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of odour emissions from animal housing systems with low ammonia emission.
    Ogink NW; Koerkamp PW
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):245-52. PubMed ID: 11762469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ammonia and odour emissions from UK pig farms and nitrogen leaching from outdoor pig production. A review.
    Webb J; Broomfield M; Jones S; Donovan B
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():865-75. PubMed ID: 24211346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development of a procedure to determine odour emissions from animal farming for regulatory purposes in Flanders.
    Van Langenhove H; De Bruyn G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):205-10. PubMed ID: 11762463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monitoring of biological odour filtration in closed environments with olfactometry and an electronic nose.
    Willers H; de Gijsel P; Ogink N; D'Amico A; Martinelli E; Di Natale C; van Ras N; van der Waarde J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):93-100. PubMed ID: 15484747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Odour and ammonia emissions from intensive pig units in Ireland.
    Hayes ET; Curran TP; Dodd VA
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 May; 97(7):940-8. PubMed ID: 15964192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. H2S, VOC, TOC, electronic noses and odour concentration: use and comparison of different parameters for emission measurement on air treatment systems.
    Franke W; Frechen FB; Giebel S
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(9):1721-6. PubMed ID: 19448306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a fast wastewater odour characterisation procedure using a chemical sensor array.
    Ziya Oztürk Z; Tasaltin C; Engin GO; Gürek AG; Atilla D; Ahsen V; Ince M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Apr; 151(1-4):369-75. PubMed ID: 18409012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Odour emission rates from manure treatment/storage systems.
    Edeogu I; Feddes J; Coleman R; Leonard J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):269-75. PubMed ID: 11762472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of diet crude protein level on odour and ammonia emissions from finishing pig houses.
    Hayes ET; Leek AB; Curran TP; Dodd VA; Carton OT; Beattie VE; O'Doherty JV
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 Feb; 91(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 14607492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pragmatic evaluation of odour emissions from a rendering plant in southern Brazil.
    Vieira MM; Schirmer WN; de Melo Lisboa H; Belli Filho P; Guillot JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(23):24115-24124. PubMed ID: 27640055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA; Dunlop M; Duperouzel D; Burrell D; Bell K; Gallagher E; Nicholas P; Heinrich N
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jan; 100(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18625551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of odour emissions in a wastewater treatment plant using a drone-based chemical sensor system.
    Burgués J; Doñate S; Esclapez MD; Saúco L; Marco S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 846():157290. PubMed ID: 35839880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of sniffing team observations: experience of field measurements.
    Van Langenhove H; Van Broeck G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 11762485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new intelligent electronic nose system for measuring and analysing livestock and poultry farm odours.
    Pan L; Yang SX
    Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Dec; 135(1-3):399-408. PubMed ID: 17385056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring techniques for odour abatement assessment.
    Muñoz R; Sivret EC; Parcsi G; Lebrero R; Wang X; Suffet IH; Stuetz RM
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5129-49. PubMed ID: 20696458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent.
    Sohn JH; Smith R; Yoong E; Hudson N; Kim TI
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 15484742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.