These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11762485)

  • 1. Applicability of sniffing team observations: experience of field measurements.
    Van Langenhove H; Van Broeck G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 11762485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a procedure to determine odour emissions from animal farming for regulatory purposes in Flanders.
    Van Langenhove H; De Bruyn G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):205-10. PubMed ID: 11762463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of odor emission rate from landfill areas using the sniffing team method.
    Nicolas J; Craffe F; Romain AC
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1259-69. PubMed ID: 16360313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different approaches for the estimation of odour emissions from landfill surfaces.
    Lucernoni F; Capelli L; Sironi S
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():345-353. PubMed ID: 27769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Odour and ammonia emissions from intensive poultry units in Ireland.
    Hayes ET; Curran TP; Dodd VA
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 May; 97(7):933-9. PubMed ID: 15964188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Odour annoyance in a residential area near a papermill.
    van den Hazel PJ; Waegemaekers CH
    Public Health Rev; 1991-1992; 19(1-4):251-62. PubMed ID: 1844274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Odour impact assessment by considering short-term ambient concentrations: A multi-model and two-site comparison.
    Invernizzi M; Brancher M; Sironi S; Capelli L; Piringer M; Schauberger G
    Environ Int; 2020 Nov; 144():105990. PubMed ID: 32795747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Directive on odour in ambient air: an established system of odour measurement and odour regulation in Germany.
    Both R
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):119-26. PubMed ID: 11762451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent odour regulation developments in Flanders: ambient odour quality standards based on dose-response relationships.
    Van Broeck G; Van Langenhove H; Nieuwejaers B
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):103-10. PubMed ID: 11762449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting odour impact using the Austrian odour dispersion model (AODM).
    Schauberger G; Piringer M
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):197-204. PubMed ID: 11762462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dispersion modeling of odour, gases, and respirable dust using AERMOD for poultry and dairy barns in the Canadian Prairies.
    Huang D; Guo H
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():620-628. PubMed ID: 31301502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Olfactometric approach for the evaluation of citizens' exposure to industrial emissions in the city of Terni, Italy.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P; Rossi A; Austeri C
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 21106227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modelling of odour dispersion as a support tool for the improvements of high odours impact plants.
    Luciano A; Torretta V; Mancini G; Eleuteri A; Raboni M; Viotti P
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 27384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.
    Brose G; Gallmann E; Hartung E; Jungbluth T
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):59-64. PubMed ID: 11762484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Odour emission rates from manure treatment/storage systems.
    Edeogu I; Feddes J; Coleman R; Leonard J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):269-75. PubMed ID: 11762472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Odour sampling 1: Physical chemistry considerations.
    Hudson N; Ayoko GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):3982-92. PubMed ID: 17596941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different approaches for odour impact assessment: dispersion modelling (CALPUFF) vs field inspection (CEN/TC 264).
    Dentoni L; Capelli L; Sironi S; Guillot JM; Rossi AN
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(8):1731-8. PubMed ID: 24185053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dispersion modelling approach to determine the odour impact of intensive poultry production units in Ireland.
    Hayes ET; Curran TP; Dodd VA
    Bioresour Technol; 2006 Oct; 97(15):1773-9. PubMed ID: 16263273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an odorant emission model for sewage treatment works.
    Gostelow P; Parsons SA; Cobb J
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):181-8. PubMed ID: 11762460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.