These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11763257)

  • 21. Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition.
    Grainger J; Mathôt S; Vitu F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():35-40. PubMed ID: 24370788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of ocular transverse chromatic aberration on peripheral word identification.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Laukkanen H; Sheedy JE
    Vision Res; 2011 Nov; 51(21-22):2273-81. PubMed ID: 21945482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Target letter inclusion in single and multiple word substrings and identification accuracy.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Apr; 115(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3385413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.
    Jordan TR; Bevan KM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.
    Whatham AR; Mermoud C; Déruaz A; Goldschmidt M; Zesiger P; Safran AB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Mar; 26(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 16460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reading speed does not benefit from increased line spacing in AMD patients.
    Chung ST; Jarvis SH; Woo SY; Hanson K; Jose RT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Sep; 85(9):827-33. PubMed ID: 18772718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Letter encoding in visual word identification: more evidence for a word-integration explanation for parafoveal preview effects in reading.
    Kwantes PJ; Mewhort DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of text orientation, visual meridian, and inter-character spacing on word identification in the retinal periphery.
    Chaparro A; Liao C
    Perception; 2003; 32(11):1339-50. PubMed ID: 14959795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Letters, not words, are processed holistically.
    Wilson KD; Taylor JM
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1572-4. PubMed ID: 19950487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preneural limitations on letter identification in central and peripheral vision.
    Beckmann PJ; Legge GE
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Dec; 19(12):2349-62. PubMed ID: 12469729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual spatial attention to stimuli presented on the vertical and horizontal meridian: an ERP study.
    Gunter TC; Wijers AA; Jackson JL; Mulder G
    Psychophysiology; 1994 Mar; 31(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 8153250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A crowdful of letters: disentangling the role of similarity, eccentricity and spatial frequencies in letter crowding.
    Zahabi S; Arguin M
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():45-51. PubMed ID: 24561213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The optimal use of non-optimal letter information in foveal and parafoveal word recognition.
    Bernard JB; Castet E
    Vision Res; 2019 Feb; 155():44-61. PubMed ID: 30629974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Side flankers produce less crowding, but only for letters.
    Vejnović D; Zdravković S
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():217-27. PubMed ID: 26218514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.