These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11763943)
1. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design. Beals D; Ngo T; Feng Y; Cook D; Grau DG; Weber DA Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):5A-14A. PubMed ID: 11763943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Oral-B CrossAction manual toothbrush: a 5-year literature review. Cugini M; Warren PR J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 May; 72(4):323. PubMed ID: 16684475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies. Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Pioch T; Galustians HJ; Qaqish J; Sharma NC Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11803988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design. Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative clinical investigation of a novel toothbrush designed to enhance plaque removal efficacy. Cronin MJ; Dembling WZ; Low MA; Jacobs DM; Weber DA Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):21A-26A. PubMed ID: 11763940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12518499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush. Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An advanced toothbrush with improved plaque removal efficacy. Sharma NC; Qaqish JG; Galustians HJ; King DW; Low MA; Jacobs DM; Weber DA Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):15A-19A. PubMed ID: 11763939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush. Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles. Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies. Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness. Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal. Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A single-use and 3-month clinical investigation of the comparative efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush. Cronin MJ; Dembling W; Conforti NJ; Liebman J; Cugini M; Warren PR Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():19B-24B. PubMed ID: 12003483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative single-use clinical study of the efficacy of two manual toothbrushes with angled bristles. Cronin MJ; Dembling WZ; Jacobs DM; Low MA; Warren PR Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):263-6. PubMed ID: 11803986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque. Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of brushing time and plaque removal potential of two manual toothbrushes. Terézhalmy GT; Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Grender JM; Bartizek RD Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Nov; 6(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 19138183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory evaluations of two toothbrushes for removal of artificial plaque above, around and below the gingival margin. Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 12619266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating battery-powered toothbrush and a standard manual toothbrush. Dörfer CE; von Bethlenfalvy ER; Staehle HJ; Pioch T Am J Dent; 2001 Nov; 14 Spec No():25B-28B. PubMed ID: 12003484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes. Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]