These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
596 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11764110)
1. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations. Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retentive strength of an amalgam bonding agent: chemical vs light vs dual curing. Winkler MM; Rhodes B; Moore BK Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 11203863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types. Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique. Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of tetric ceram/excite and Ariston pHc/Ariston liner. Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):309-13. PubMed ID: 11803996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of dentin-amalgam bonding agents. Turner EW; St Germain HA; Meiers JC Am J Dent; 1995 Aug; 8(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 7576386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations. Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation. Muniz M; Quioca J; Dolci GS; Reis A; Loguercio AD Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 15853109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume. da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers. Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study. Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations. Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives. Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A; Perry R Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 14677616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials. Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material. Lindquist TJ; Connolly J J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]