These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11764369)

  • 1. The John Charnley Award: Three-dimensional analysis of the cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty.
    Valdivia GG; Dunbar MJ; Parker DA; Woolfrey MR; MacDonald SJ; McCalden RW; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):38-51. PubMed ID: 11764369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral cement grading in total hip arthroplasty.
    Harvey EJ; Tanzer M; Bobyn JD
    J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jun; 13(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 9645519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cement mantle of femoral hip implants is more influenced by stem-broach sizing than by shape: an in vitro CT analysis of straight Charnley-Kerboul and anatomic Lubinus SPII stems.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Nov; 129(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 19198861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips.
    Kawate K; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Biggs SA; Jasty M; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):70-6. PubMed ID: 9917592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cement Mantle Quality and Stem Alignment in Cemented Collarless Polished Tapered Stems Implanted via the Direct Anterior and Direct Lateral Approaches: A Single Institution Experience.
    Pomeroy E; McGoldrick NP; Moody PW; Vasarhelyi EM; McCalden RW; Lanting BA
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2208-2213. PubMed ID: 35580767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomic stem design reduces risk of thin cement mantles in primary hip replacement.
    Hank C; Schneider M; Achary CS; Smith L; Breusch SJ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Jan; 130(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19513737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
    Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The posterior approach reduces the risk of thin cement mantles with a straight femoral stem design.
    Macpherson GJ; Hank C; Schneider M; Trayner M; Elton R; Howie CR; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Jun; 81(3):292-5. PubMed ID: 20446829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro analysis of the cement mantle of femoral hip implants: development and validation of a CT-scan based measurement tool.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 16022979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement.
    Fisher DA; Tsang AC; Paydar N; Milionis S; Turner CH
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1173-7. PubMed ID: 9456387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CT analysis of defects of the cement mantle and alignment of the stem: in vitro comparison of Charnley-Kerboul femoral hip implants inserted line-to-line and undersized in paired femora.
    Scheerlinck T; de Mey J; Deklerck R; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16365114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Porosity of neat and composite bone cement mantles.
    Hansen CL; McQueen DA; Friis EA; Cooke FW; Widenhouse CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 18280425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The femoral cement mantle in three total hip replacements.
    Mellor SJ; Ripley LG; Ricketts DM
    Int Orthop; 2004 Feb; 28(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 14534830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of cement mantles in collared versus collarless femoral components.
    Mahoney CR; Yun AG; Pellicci PM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 May; 35(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 16764183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impaction allografting of the proximal femur using a Charnley-type stem: a cement mantle analysis.
    Masterson EL; Busch CA; Duncan CP; Drabu K
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Jan; 14(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9926954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity analysis of a cemented hip stem to implant position and cement mantle thickness.
    Shi J; Browne M; Strickland M; Flivik G; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014 Nov; 17(15):1671-84. PubMed ID: 23405986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.
    Beaulé PE; Matar WY; Poitras P; Smit K; May O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Jan; 467(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 18923883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.