These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11764638)

  • 1. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam.
    Dlugokinski M; Browning WD
    J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental practitioners' experiences on the usefulness of restorative materials in Finland 1992-1996.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 1998 Nov; 185(10):540-2. PubMed ID: 9874887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Restoration of posterior teeth in clinical practice: evidence base for choosing amalgam versus composite.
    Kovarik RE
    Dent Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 53(1):71-6, ix. PubMed ID: 19215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes of some European dental undergraduate students to the placement of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth.
    Lynch CD; Guillem SE; Nagrani B; Gilmour AS; Ericson D
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):916-26. PubMed ID: 20557432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations].
    Favero L; Berengo M; Pellegrini F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior composites for modern operative dentistry.
    Douglas WH
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):44-7. PubMed ID: 9120612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Materials for conservative posterior restorations.
    Donovan TE; Cho GC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):32-8. PubMed ID: 9120610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors associated with amalgam restorations in Taiwan.
    Hu SW; Yang LC; Chang HY
    Br Dent J; 2002 Oct; 193(7):411-4. PubMed ID: 12420015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Hondrum SO
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 11199613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior composite resin inlays and onlays: a comparison of available systems.
    Porter KH
    Tex Dent J; 1990 May; 107(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 2375001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct options for tooth-colored restorations.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 20(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 18567484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.