These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11764831)

  • 21. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Schmidt M; Chen HY; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):357-66. PubMed ID: 11504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
    Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of resin-based composite and ceramic inlays luted to sound human teeth.
    da Silva SB; Hilgert LA; Busato AL
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):404-6. PubMed ID: 15724750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture loads of all-ceramic crowns under wet and dry fatigue conditions.
    Borges GA; Caldas D; Taskonak B; Yan J; Sobrinho LC; de Oliveira WJ
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec; 18(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 19682214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic.
    Lüthy H; Loeffel O; Hammerle CH
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 16143382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro.
    Bott B; Hannig M
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 12686289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro.
    Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Resch U
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):137-46. PubMed ID: 10530275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of two self-adhesive cements on marginal adaptation and strength of esthetic ceramic CAD/CAM molar crowns.
    Mörmann W; Wolf D; Ender A; Bindl A; Göhring T; Attin T
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 19432763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement.
    Ernst CP; Wenzl N; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 9576325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B; Gruber R; Eickemeyer G; Rammelsberg P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation.
    Federlin M; Schmidt S; Hiller KA; Thonemann B; Schmalz G
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):560-70. PubMed ID: 15470879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer.
    Monaco C; Baldissara P; dall'Orologio GD; Scotti R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11842911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study.
    Höglund C; van Dijken J; Olofsson AL
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(4):169-71. PubMed ID: 1455328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Loher H; Kolbeck C; Trempler C; Stemplinger B; Kopzon V; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 18372038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.