111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1176508)
1. Alumina and zirconia coated vitallium oral endosteal implants in beagles.
Cranin AN; Schnitman PA; Rabkin SM; Onesto EJ
J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):257-62. PubMed ID: 1176508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials.
Thomas KA; Kay JF; Cook SD; Jarcho M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Dec; 21(12):1395-414. PubMed ID: 3429474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study.
Lee TM; Yang CY; Chang E; Tsai RS
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Dec; 71(4):652-60. PubMed ID: 15505828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone bonding behavior of bead-coated alumina ceramic under load-bearing conditions.
Takagi H; Yamamuro T; Hyakuna K; Nakamura T; Kotoura Y; Oka M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Aug; 23(A2 Suppl):161-81. PubMed ID: 2674146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vapor-deposited carbon-coated tooth root implants: preliminary evaluation of a stylized tooth implant system in dogs.
Michieli S; Leake D; Freeman S; Bokros J; Haubold A; Pizzoferrato A
J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jul; 42(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 287793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft tissue response to four dense ceramic materials and two clinically used biomaterials.
Richardson WC; Klawitter JJ; Sauer BW; Pruitt JR; Hulbert SF
J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):73-80. PubMed ID: 170288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone-bonding behavior under load-bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite.
Li ZL; Kitsugi T; Yamamuro T; Chang YS; Senaha Y; Takagi H; Nakamura T; Oka M
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Sep; 29(9):1081-8. PubMed ID: 8567706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Biologic width"and crestal bone remodeling with sintered porous-surfaced dental implants: a study in dogs.
Deporter D; Al-Sayyed A; Pilliar RM; Valiquette N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 18700381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peri-implant tissue response to TiO2 surface modified implants.
Rossi S; Tirri T; Paldan H; Kuntsi-Vaattovaara H; Tulamo R; Närhi T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 18261120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative histologic evaluation of LTI carbon, carbon-coated aluminum oxide and uncoated aluminum oxide dental implants.
Cook SD; Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Kent JN
J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 6863353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Al2O3-ceramic as material for dental implants: experimental and clinical study for the development of screw- and extension-implants.
Ehrl PA; Reuther J; Frenkel G
Int J Oral Surg; 1981; 10(Suppl 1):93-8. PubMed ID: 6807914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between the bony interfaces of titanium and hydroxyapatite-alumina plasma-sprayed titanium blade implants.
Morimoto K; Kihara A; Takeshita F; Akedo H; Suetsugu T
J Oral Implantol; 1988; 14(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 2855931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Light and scanning electronmicroscopic studies of border surfaces of aluminum oxide-ceramic implants in the dog mandible].
Krempien B; Schulte W; Kleineikenscheidt H; Lindner K; Schareyka R; Heimke G
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1978 May; 33(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 274294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year follow-up of first consecutive 100 zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of 2 different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):430-5. PubMed ID: 17622010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bone-implant interface shear strength of hydroxyapatite-coated and alumina-coated metal implants.
Inadome T; Hayashi K; Nakashima Y; Tsumura H; Sugioka Y
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Jan; 29(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7713954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue healing at titanium implants coated with type I collagen. An experimental study in dogs.
Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Linder E; Liljenberg B; Berglundh T
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 May; 34(5):452-8. PubMed ID: 17355363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study.
Tetè S; Mastrangelo F; Bianchi A; Zizzari V; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19344025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental peri-implant tissue breakdown around different dental implant surfaces: clinical and radiographic evaluation in dogs.
Martins MC; Abi-Rached RS; Shibli JA; Araujo MW; Marcantonio E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 15623059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
