These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11765734)

  • 1. The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process.
    Newell BR; Bright JE
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Nov; 54(4):1087-104. PubMed ID: 11765734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Affective discrimination and the implicit learning process.
    Manza L; Bornstein RF
    Conscious Cogn; 1995 Dec; 4(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 8750415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit preferences: the role(s) of familiarity in the structural mere exposure effect.
    Zizak DM; Reber AS
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Jun; 13(2):336-62. PubMed ID: 15134764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit learning and dyslexia.
    Folia V; Uddén J; Forkstam C; Ingvar M; Hagoort P; Petersson KM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():132-50. PubMed ID: 19076394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning.
    Shanks DR; Johnstone T; Staggs L
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):216-52. PubMed ID: 9080793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.
    Johnstone T; Shanks DR
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Feb; 42(1):61-112. PubMed ID: 11161417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning.
    Kinder A; Shanks DR; Cock J; Tunney RJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Dec; 132(4):551-65. PubMed ID: 14640848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning.
    Rüsseler J; Gerth I; Münte TF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Jul; 28(5):808-27. PubMed ID: 16723326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do children with developmental dyslexia have impairments in implicit learning?
    Pavlidou EV; Kelly ML; Williams JM
    Dyslexia; 2010 May; 16(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 20440744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploration of implicit artificial grammar learning in Parkinson's disease.
    Peigneux P; Meulemans T; Van der Linden M; Salmon E; Petit H
    Acta Neurol Belg; 1999 Jun; 99(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10427353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluency does not express implicit knowledge of artificial grammars.
    Scott RB; Dienes Z
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):372-88. PubMed ID: 19932473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM; Kelly LM
    Ann Dyslexia; 2009 Jun; 59(1):55-77. PubMed ID: 19326218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential markers of expectation violation in an artificial grammar learning task.
    Carrión RE; Bly BM
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jan; 18(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17301688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does stimulus appearance affect learning?
    Pothos EM; Chater N; Ziori E
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(2):275-99. PubMed ID: 16841782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism.
    Christiansen MH; Louise Kelly M; Shillcock RC; Greenfield K
    Cognition; 2010 Sep; 116(3):382-93. PubMed ID: 20605017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The subliminal mere exposure effect does not generalize to structurally related stimuli.
    Newell BR; Bright JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Mar; 57(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 12674370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: an rTMS study.
    Uddén J; Folia V; Forkstam C; Ingvar M; Fernandez G; Overeem S; van Elswijk G; Hagoort P; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1224():69-78. PubMed ID: 18617159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: implicitly learning more than chunks.
    Kuhn G; Dienes Z
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1417-32. PubMed ID: 16393055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual feature learning in artificial grammar classification.
    Chang GY; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):714-22. PubMed ID: 15099138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.