These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11766008)

  • 21. The Effects of Obesity Myths on Perceptions of Sexual Assault Victims and Perpetrators' Credibility.
    Yamawaki N; Riley C; Rasmussen C; Cook M
    J Interpers Violence; 2018 Feb; 33(4):662-685. PubMed ID: 26663743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An archival analysis of actual cases of historic child sexual abuse: A comparison of jury and bench trials.
    Read JD; Connolly DA; Welsh A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):259-85. PubMed ID: 16786401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors that Influence Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Credibility.
    Call AA; Wingrove T
    J Child Sex Abus; 2022; 31(6):726-742. PubMed ID: 35833559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Support Person Presence and Child Victim Testimony: Believe it or Not.
    McAuliff BD; Lapin J; Michel S
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):508-27. PubMed ID: 26294385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case.
    Magyarics CL; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Lippert A
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 26237334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Community members' perceptions of evidence: the effects of gender in a recovered memory civil trial.
    ForsterLee R; Horowitz IA; Ho R; ForsterLee L; McGovern A
    J Appl Psychol; 1999 Aug; 84(4):484-95. PubMed ID: 10504892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How video image size interacts with evidence strength, defendant emotion, and the defendant-victim relationship to alter perceptions of the defendant.
    Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):496-507. PubMed ID: 24715347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptions of child sexual abuse:victim and perpetrator characteristics, treatment efficacy, and lay vs. legal opinions of abuse.
    Reynolds LL; Birkimer JC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2002; 11(1):53-74. PubMed ID: 16221633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Sanchez RP; Sego SA
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Jun; 21(3):299-325. PubMed ID: 9209160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.
    Golding JM; Fryman HM; Marsil DF; Yozwiak JA
    Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1311-21. PubMed ID: 14637304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
    Holcomb MJ; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2007; 16(2):79-95. PubMed ID: 17895233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
    Pickel KL
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of gender in the perception of elder physical abuse in court.
    Golding JM; Yozwiak JA; Kinstle TL; Marsil DF
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):605-14. PubMed ID: 16254745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived.
    McKimmie BM; Masser BM; Bongiorno R
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Aug; 29(12):2273-2303. PubMed ID: 24470567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The perception of elder sexual abuse in the courtroom.
    Hodell EC; Golding JM; Yozwiak JA; Bradshaw GS; Kinstle TL; Marsil DF
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Jun; 15(6):678-98. PubMed ID: 19299250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.
    Lynch KR; Wasarhaley NE; Golding JM; Simcic T
    J Interpers Violence; 2013 Nov; 28(16):3205-22. PubMed ID: 23929601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
    Butler E; Jacquin K
    Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intoxicated But Not Incapacitated: Are There Effective Methods to Assist Juries in Interpreting Evidence of Voluntary Complainant Intoxication in Cases of Rape?
    Nitschke FT; Masser BM; McKimmie BM; Riachi M
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):4335-4359. PubMed ID: 30058439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.