143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1176625)
1. Propagation and isolation of group A coxsackieviruses in RD cells.
Schmidt NJ; Ho HH; Lennette EH
J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Sep; 2(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 1176625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of guinea pig embryo cell cultures for isolation and propagation of group A coxsackieviruses.
Landry ML; Madore HP; Fong CK; Hsiung GD
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 13(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 6263943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity of rhabdomyosarcoma and guinea pig embryo cell cultures to field isolates of difficult-to-cultivate group A coxsackieviruses.
Lipson SM; Walderman R; Costello P; Szabo K
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jul; 26(7):1298-303. PubMed ID: 2842370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human rhabdomyosarcoma cells for rapid detection of enteroviruses by shell-vial assay.
Pérez-Ruiz M; Navarro-Marí JM; Palacios Del Valle E; Rosa-Fraile M
J Med Microbiol; 2003 Sep; 52(Pt 9):789-791. PubMed ID: 12909656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine enterovirus diagnosis in a human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line.
Bell EJ; Cosgrove BP
Bull World Health Organ; 1980; 58(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 6251982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recombinant murine L20B cell line supports multiplication of group A coxsackieviruses.
Nadkarni SS; Deshpande JM
J Med Virol; 2003 May; 70(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 12629647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Sensitivity of group A coxsackieviruses and ECHO viruses, and isolation from clinical specimens by RD-18S cells derived by cloning from RD cells].
Sakae K; Ishihara Y; Morishita T; Nishio O; Sumi J; Inoue H
Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1985 Jul; 59(7):664-9. PubMed ID: 2997341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of rhabdomyosarcoma, buffalo green monkey kidney epithelial, A549 (human lung epithelial) cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts for isolation of enteroviruses from clinical samples.
Kok TW; Pryor T; Payne L
J Clin Virol; 1998 Jul; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9784144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining cell lines to optimize isolation of human enterovirus from clinical specimens: report of 25 years of experience.
Prim N; Rodríguez G; Margall N; Del Cuerpo M; Trallero G; Rabella N
J Med Virol; 2013 Jan; 85(1):116-20. PubMed ID: 23124895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A combination of four cell types for rapid detection of enteroviruses in clinical specimens.
Dagan R; Menegus MA
J Med Virol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 3016165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidemiologic features and virus isolation of enteroviruses in Northern Taiwan during 2000-2008.
Tsao KC; Huang CG; Huang YL; Chen FC; Huang PN; Huang YC; Lin TY; Shih SR; Chang SC
J Virol Methods; 2010 May; 165(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 20214926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the susceptibility of three human gut tumour-derived differentiated epithelial cell lines, primary monkey kidney cells and human rhabdomyosarcoma cell line to 66-prototype strains of human enteroviruses.
Patel JR; Daniel J; Mathan VI
J Virol Methods; 1985 Dec; 12(3-4):209-16. PubMed ID: 3009511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of multiple shell vial cell lines for isolation of enteroviruses: a national perspective.
She RC; Crist G; Billetdeaux E; Langer J; Petti CA
J Clin Virol; 2006 Nov; 37(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 16884950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RD cells in the laboratory diagnosis of enteroviruses.
Wecker I; ter Meulen V
Med Microbiol Immunol; 1977 Dec; 163(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 203835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative sensitivity of various cell culture systems for isolation of viruses from wastewater and fecal samples.
Schmidt NJ; Ho HH; Riggs JL; Lennette EH
Appl Environ Microbiol; 1978 Sep; 36(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 215087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Presumptive identification of enteroviruses with RD, HEp-2, and RMK cell lines.
Johnston SL; Siegel CS
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 May; 28(5):1049-50. PubMed ID: 2161864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fourteen years' surveillance of coxsackievirus group A in Kyoto 1996‒2009 using mouse, RD-18S, and Vero cells.
Konno M; Yoshioka M; Sugie M; Maguchi T; Nakamura T; Kizawa M; Umegaki Y; Yasutake H; Ishikawa Y; Hanaoka N; Okabe N; Taniguchi K; Shimizu H; Fujimoto T
Jpn J Infect Dis; 2011; 64(2):167-8. PubMed ID: 21519137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunofluorescence staining of group B coxsackieviruses.
French ML; Schmidt NJ; Emmons RW; Lennette EH
Appl Microbiol; 1972 Jan; 23(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 4621797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidemiology and diagnostic methodology for enterovirus infection, including cerebrospinal fluid analysis: a 5-year review.
Lin MC; Chan YJ; Chen CJ; Tang RB; Wu KG
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2008 Dec; 41(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 19255687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Method for selecting optimal cells for enterovirus isolation as determined in an outbreak of echovirus type 33 meningitis.
Druyts-Voets E; Yane F; Bosmans E; Colaert J; Desmyter J
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 4(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 2990920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
