These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11766787)

  • 1. Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane.
    Ozaki H; Li H
    Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11766787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhanced modelling and experimental validation of ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane system for treatment of synthetic brackish water.
    Norizam SS; Hussain MA; Junaidi MUM
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 84(10-11):3372-3387. PubMed ID: 34850734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behaviour of RO98pHt polyamide membrane in reverse osmosis and low reverse osmosis conditions for phenol removal.
    Hidalgo AM; León G; Gómez M; Murcia MD; Gómez E; Gómez JL
    Environ Technol; 2011 Oct; 32(13-14):1497-502. PubMed ID: 22329140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of operating conditions on the separation of ammonium and nitrate ions with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Koyuncu I
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2002 Aug; 37(7):1347-59. PubMed ID: 15328697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the impacts of membrane type, coating, fouling, chemical properties and water chemistry on reverse osmosis rejection of seven nitrosoalklyamines, including NDMA.
    Steinle-Darling E; Zedda M; Plumlee MH; Ridgway HF; Reinhard M
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3959-67. PubMed ID: 17582457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of reverse osmosis membrane age on rejection of NDMA precursors and formation of NDMA in finished water after full advanced treatment for potable reuse.
    Roback SL; Ishida KP; Plumlee MH
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():120-131. PubMed ID: 31170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Removal of fluoride and natural organic matter from natural tropical brackish waters by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis with varying water chemistry.
    Owusu-Agyeman I; Reinwald M; Jeihanipour A; Schäfer AI
    Chemosphere; 2019 Feb; 217():47-58. PubMed ID: 30404048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis.
    Hancock NT; Xu P; Heil DM; Bellona C; Cath TY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8483-90. PubMed ID: 21838294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of feed solution chemistry on low pressure reverse osmosis filtration of cesium and strontium.
    Ding S; Yang Y; Huang H; Liu H; Hou LA
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Aug; 294():27-34. PubMed ID: 25841084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Functional Chemistry on the Rejection of Low-Molecular Weight Neutral Organics through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(19):11401-11409. PubMed ID: 31513383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2005 Sep; 261(1-2):76-86. PubMed ID: 16134262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward a reverse osmosis membrane system for recycling space mission wastewater.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    Life Support Biosph Sci; 2000; 7(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 11676440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
    Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
    J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) using low pressure reverse osmosis membrane (LPROM).
    Razak AR; Ujang Z; Ozaki H
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):161-8. PubMed ID: 17978444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.