These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11766937)

  • 1. Seeing two sides at once: effects of viewpoint and object structure on recognizing three-dimensional objects.
    Johnson SH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1468-84. PubMed ID: 11766937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Bülthoff HH; Poggio T
    Curr Biol; 1994 May; 4(5):401-14. PubMed ID: 7922354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J
    Cereb Cortex; 1995; 5(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 7613082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viewpoint dependence and scene context effects generalize to depth rotated three-dimensional objects.
    Kallmayer A; Võ ML; Draschkow D
    J Vis; 2023 Sep; 23(10):9. PubMed ID: 37707802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects.
    Humphrey GK; Khan SC
    Can J Psychol; 1992 Jun; 46(2):170-90. PubMed ID: 1451040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition.
    Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):911-30. PubMed ID: 19653738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.
    Biederman I; Gerhardstein PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Dec; 19(6):1162-82. PubMed ID: 8294886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Viewpoint dependence in the recognition of non-elongated familiar objects: testing the effects of symmetry, front-back axis, and familiarity.
    Niimi R; Yokosawa K
    Perception; 2009; 38(4):533-51. PubMed ID: 19522322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An automated apparatus for presenting depth-rotated three-dimensional objects in human and animal object recognition research.
    Friedman A; Spetch ML; Lank I
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 May; 35(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 12834095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invariant object recognition in the visual system with novel views of 3D objects.
    Stringer SM; Rolls ET
    Neural Comput; 2002 Nov; 14(11):2585-96. PubMed ID: 12433291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of novel tasks for studying view-invariant object recognition in rodents: Sensitivity to scopolamine.
    Mitchnick KA; Wideman CE; Huff AE; Palmer D; McNaughton BL; Winters BD
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 May; 344():48-56. PubMed ID: 29412155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orientation-specific possibility priming for novel three-dimensional objects.
    Williams P; Tarr MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jul; 61(5):963-76. PubMed ID: 10499008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability.
    Hayward WG; Williams P
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Jan; 11(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 11228847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys.
    Logothetis NK; Pauls J; Poggio T
    Curr Biol; 1995 May; 5(5):552-63. PubMed ID: 7583105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is.
    James KH; Humphrey GK; Goodale MA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Jun; 55(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 11433782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Encoding 'regular' and 'random' sequences of views of novel three-dimensional objects.
    Harman KL; Humphrey GK
    Perception; 1999; 28(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 10664756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes.
    Nakatani C; Pollatsek A; Johnson SH
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):115-39. PubMed ID: 11873843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repetition blindness for rotated objects.
    Hayward WG; Zhou G; Man WF; Harris IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 20121295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A stereo disadvantage for recognizing rotated familiar objects.
    Pasqualotto A; Hayward WG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):832-8. PubMed ID: 19815785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.