These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11767019)

  • 1. Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?
    Vernon SA; Ghosh G
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Aug; 15(Pt 4):458-63. PubMed ID: 11767019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The changing pattern of glaucoma referrals by optometrists.
    Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 5)():854-7. PubMed ID: 10070523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of optometrist glaucoma referrals against published guidelines.
    Khan S; Clarke J; Kotecha A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 23009293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glaucoma screening by optometrists: positive predictive value of visual field testing.
    Newman DK; Anwar S; Jordan K
    Eye (Lond); 1998; 12 ( Pt 6)():921-4. PubMed ID: 10325986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of referral to a glaucoma clinic.
    Bell RW; O'Brien C
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9135806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Community refinement of glaucoma referrals.
    Henson DB; Spencer AF; Harper R; Cadman EJ
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jan; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12579165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.
    Theodossiades J; Murdoch I; Cousens S
    Eye (Lond); 2004 May; 18(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 15131679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of glaucoma referrals in Southeast Scotland: effect of the new general ophthalmic service contract, Eyecare integration pilot programme and NICE guidelines.
    El-Assal K; Foulds J; Dobson S; Sanders R
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26643710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Community optometrist referral of those aged 65 and over for raised IOP post-NICE: AOP guidance versus joint college guidance--an epidemiological model using BEAP.
    Vernon SA; Hillman JG; Macnab HK; Bacon P; van der Hoek J; Vernon OK; Bhargarva A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 95(11):1534-6. PubMed ID: 21310800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
    Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cambridge community Optometry Glaucoma Scheme.
    Keenan J; Shahid H; Bourne RR; White AJ; Martin KR
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 43(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 25070417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.
    Bowling B; Chen SD; Salmon JF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 89(9):1102-4. PubMed ID: 16113358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
    Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
    Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma electronic patient record--design, experience and study of high-risk patients.
    Imrie F; Blaikie A; Cobb C; Sinclair A; Wilson D; Dobson S; Sanders R
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Sep; 19(9):956-62. PubMed ID: 16052257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland.
    Sii S; Nasser A; Loo CY; Croghan C; Rotchford A; Agarwal PK
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 103(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 29777044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the quality of glaucoma referral letters based on a survey of glaucoma specialists and a glaucoma guideline.
    Cheng J; Beltran-Agullo L; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):126-133. PubMed ID: 24140116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do optometrists screen for glaucoma?
    Vernon SA; Henry DJ
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():743-6. PubMed ID: 2630356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
    Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Referrals to ophthalmology: optometric and general practice comparison.
    Pierscionek TJ; Moore JE; Pierscionek BK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jan; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19154278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glaucoma detection in the community: does ongoing training of optometrists have a lasting effect?
    Patel UD; Murdoch IE; Theodossiades J
    Eye (Lond); 2006 May; 20(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 16021189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.