387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11767190)
1. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemodynamic comparison of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprosthetic valves.
Khan S; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV75-81. PubMed ID: 2225438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trans-catheter valve-in-valve implantation: in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves.
Walther T; Dehdashtian MM; Khanna R; Young E; Goldbrunner PJ; Lee W
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 21466959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David T;
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
Hobson NA; Wilkinson GA; Wheeldon NM; Lynch J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 16359066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
Ruzicka DJ; Hettich I; Hutter A; Bleiziffer S; Badiu CC; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R; Eichinger WB
Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tubular heart valves: a new tissue prosthesis design--preclinical evaluation of the 3F aortic bioprosthesis.
Cox JL; Ad N; Myers K; Gharib M; Quijano RC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 16077422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indication of cavitation in mechanical heart valve patients.
Andersen TS; Johansen P; Paulsen PK; Nygaard H; Hasenkam JM
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Nov; 12(6):790-6. PubMed ID: 14658822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
