159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11767803)
1. New role for institutional review boards when reviewing international projects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Nov; 15(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11767803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommendations for federal "super agency" would affect institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12530378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
Saver RS
William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The forum. Mistaking procedural requirements for ethical standards.
Macklin R
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(4):371-2, 378-82. PubMed ID: 12678075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New federal guidance adds duties for institutional review boards (IRBs).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Nov; 20(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conflict + interest: financial incentives and informed consent in human subject research.
Benbow S
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2003; 17(1):181-215. PubMed ID: 14986653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality improvement or research: a distinction without a difference?
Doezema D; Hauswald M
IRB; 2002; 24(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 13678030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
