These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11767934)

  • 1. Approaches and considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants: report of recent symposia.
    Paustenbach D
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):697-704. PubMed ID: 11767934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants: the approach in the European Union.
    Meldrum M
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):730-2. PubMed ID: 11767939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approach to setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants in The Netherlands.
    Feron VJ; Art JH; Mojet J
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 11767940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the human response to sensory irritation: implications for setting occupational exposure limits.
    Dalton P
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 11767938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and application of the RD50 for determining acceptable exposure levels of airborne sensory irritants for the general public.
    Kuwabara Y; Alexeeff GV; Broadwin R; Salmon AG
    Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Nov; 115(11):1609-16. PubMed ID: 18007993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A proposed approach for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants based on chemosensory models.
    Gaffney SH; Paustenbach DJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jun; 51(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 17602208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of odor and irritation, as well as risk perception, in the setting of occupational exposure limits.
    Paustenbach DJ; Gaffney SH
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Apr; 79(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 16049719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying an apppropriate occupational exposure limit (OEL) for beryllium: data gaps and current research initiatives.
    Paustenbach DJ; Madl AK; Greene JF
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 May; 16(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 11370933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of airborne sensory irritants for setting exposure limits or guidelines: A systematic approach.
    Nielsen GD; Wolkoff P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Nov; 90():308-317. PubMed ID: 28911939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local effects in the respiratory tract: relevance of subjectively measured irritation for setting occupational exposure limits.
    Arts JH; de Heer C; Woutersen RA
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Apr; 79(4):283-98. PubMed ID: 16283365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approaches to understanding chemosensory responses: new directions and new caveats.
    Kendal-Reed M
    AIHAJ; 2001; 62(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 11767937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory irritation due to methyl-2-cyanoacrylate, ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate, isopropyl-2-cyanoacrylate and 2-methoxyethyl-2-cyanoacrylate in mice.
    Gagnaire F; Marignac B; Morel G; Nunge H; Grossmann S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2003 Jun; 47(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 12765870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing short-term occupational exposure limits (STELs) for sensory irritants using predictive and
    Russell AJ; Vincent M; Buerger AN; Dotson S; Lotter J; Maier A
    Inhal Toxicol; 2024 Jan; 36(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 38252504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory irritation as a basis for setting occupational exposure limits.
    Brüning T; Bartsch R; Bolt HM; Desel H; Drexler H; Gundert-Remy U; Hartwig A; Jäckh R; Leibold E; Pallapies D; Rettenmeier AW; Schlüter G; Stropp G; Sucker K; Triebig G; Westphal G; van Thriel C
    Arch Toxicol; 2014 Oct; 88(10):1855-79. PubMed ID: 25182421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a database for sensory irritants and its use in establishing occupational exposure limits.
    Schaper M
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Sep; 54(9):488-544. PubMed ID: 8379496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Derivation of an occupational exposure limit for inorganic borates using a weight of evidence approach.
    Maier A; Vincent M; Hack E; Nance P; Ball W
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 68(3):424-37. PubMed ID: 24525063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper airway irritation, odor perception and health risk due to airborne chemicals.
    Dalton P
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():239-48. PubMed ID: 12676471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals.
    van Thriel C; Schäper M; Kiesswetter E; Kleinbeck S; Juran S; Blaszkewicz M; Fricke HH; Altmann L; Berresheim H; Brüning T
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2006 Apr; 79(4):308-21. PubMed ID: 16397801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metalworking fluid mist occupational exposure limits: a discussion of alternative methods.
    Cohen H; White EM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):501-7. PubMed ID: 16857649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of noncancer endpoints as a basis for establishing a reference concentration for formaldehyde.
    Bender J
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11846633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.