These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11770093)
21. Interactive voice response technology to measure HIV-related behavior. Schroder KE; Johnson CJ Curr HIV/AIDS Rep; 2009 Nov; 6(4):210-6. PubMed ID: 19849964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: an IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Bjorner JB; Rose M; Gandek B; Stone AA; Junghaenel DU; Ware JE Qual Life Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 23877585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Building the Evidence Base for Remote Data Collection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Comparing Reliability and Accuracy Across Survey Modalities. Greenleaf AR; Gibson DG; Khattar C; Labrique AB; Pariyo GW J Med Internet Res; 2017 May; 19(5):e140. PubMed ID: 28476728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Automated screening for at-risk drinking in a primary care office using interactive voice response. Rose GL; Skelly JM; Badger GJ; Maclean CD; Malgeri MP; Helzer JE J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2010 Sep; 71(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 20731979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of four computer-based telephone interviewing methods: getting answers to sensitive questions. Corkrey R; Parkinson L Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):354-63. PubMed ID: 12395551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An interactive voice response (IVR) system for adolescents with alcohol use disorders: a pilot study. Kaminer Y; Litt MD; Burke RH; Burleson JA Am J Addict; 2006; 15 Suppl 1():122-5. PubMed ID: 17182427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of an interactive voice response system and smartphone application in the identification of gout flares. Elmagboul N; Coburn BW; Foster J; Mudano A; Melnick J; Bergman D; Yang S; Redden D; Chen L; Filby C; Curtis JR; Mikuls TR; Saag KG Arthritis Res Ther; 2019 Jun; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 31255174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement equivalence of interactive voice response and paper versions of the EQ-5D in a cancer patient sample. Lundy JJ; Coons SJ Value Health; 2011; 14(6):867-71. PubMed ID: 21914508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pilot study of an interactive voice response system to improve medication refill compliance. Reidel K; Tamblyn R; Patel V; Huang A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Oct; 8():46. PubMed ID: 18845004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Swiontkowski MF; Engelberg R; Martin DP; Agel J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Sep; 81(9):1245-60. PubMed ID: 10505521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computerized Adaptive Testing Using the PROMIS Physical Function Item Bank Reduces Test Burden With Less Ceiling Effects Compared With the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients. Hung M; Stuart AR; Higgins TF; Saltzman CL; Kubiak EN J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Aug; 28(8):439-43. PubMed ID: 24378399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interactive voice response versus computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) surveys and sensitive questions: the 2005 National Alcohol Survey. Midanik LT; Greenfield TK J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2008 Jul; 69(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 18612574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reasons for non-adherence to cardiometabolic medications, and acceptability of an interactive voice response intervention in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes in primary care: a qualitative study. Kassavou A; Sutton S BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e015597. PubMed ID: 28801402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of interactive voice response system administration of the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. Lam MY; Lee H; Bright R; Korzenik JR; Sands BE Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2009 Apr; 15(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 19023897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptions on using interactive voice response surveys for non-communicable disease risk factors in Uganda: a qualitative exploration. Rutebemberwa E; Namutundu J; Gibson DG; Labrique AB; Ali J; Pariyo GW; Hyder AA Mhealth; 2019; 5():32. PubMed ID: 31620459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Data Collection on Sensitive Topics with Adolescents Using Interactive Voice Response Technology. Fomby P; Sastry N Methoden Daten Anal; 2019; 13(1):91-110. PubMed ID: 31031869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment methods and schedules for collecting daily process data on substance use related health behaviors: A randomized control study. Buu A; Massey LS; Walton MA; Cranford JA; Zimmerman MA; Cunningham RM Drug Alcohol Depend; 2017 Sep; 178():159-164. PubMed ID: 28651151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Administration of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: impact on office routine and physician-patient interaction. Agel J; Obremsky W; Kregor P; Keeve J; Abbott P; Buss D; Swiontkowski M Orthopedics; 2003 Aug; 26(8):783-8; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 12938942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. "I am not alone": the feasibility and acceptability of interactive voice response-facilitated telephone peer support among older adults with heart failure. Heisler M; Halasyamani L; Resnicow K; Neaton M; Shanahan J; Brown S; Piette JD Congest Heart Fail; 2007; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 17541307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]