These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11771787)

  • 1. Reduction of the hypocone of the maxillary first molar and Class III malocclusion.
    Yamaguchi K; Kawanabe N; Tanaka E; Tanne K
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):477-85. PubMed ID: 11771787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The differences in the chronology and calcification of second molars between angle Class III and Class II occlusions in Japanese children.
    Haruki T; Kanomi R; Shimono T
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(6):400-4. PubMed ID: 9466009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.
    Mouakeh M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):640-9. PubMed ID: 11395709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tooth size discrepancy in orthodontic patients among different malocclusion groups.
    Strujić M; Anić-Milosević S; Mestrović S; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):584-9. PubMed ID: 19339673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of second molar eruption patterns in patients with skeletal Class II and skeletal Class I malocclusions.
    Brin I; Camasuvi S; Dali N; Aizenbud D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 17169737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraction of maxillary first molars improves second and third molar inclinations in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Livas C; Halazonetis DJ; Booij JW; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 21889082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of transverse dimensional changes in surgical skeletal Class III patients with and without presurgical orthodontics.
    Wang YC; Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR; Takano-Yamamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1807-12. PubMed ID: 20493619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presence of third molar germs in orthodontic patients in Japan.
    Kajii T; Imai T; Kajii S; Iida J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 11244418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN; Abu Alhaija ES
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Third molar availability in Class II subdivision malocclusion.
    Janson G; Cruz KS; Barros SE; Woodside DG; Metaxas A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):279.e15-21. PubMed ID: 17826593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies.
    Abe R; Endo T; Shimooka S
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 20677947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of maxillary posterior dentoalveolar discrepancy on angulation of maxillary molars in individuals with skeletal open bite.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Flores-Mir C
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):34. PubMed ID: 27696312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients.
    Wedrychowska-Szulc B; Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepień P
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 20018795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.