304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11771984)
1. The influence of brain tissue anisotropy on human EEG and MEG.
Haueisen J; Tuch DS; Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Wedeen VJ; George JS; Belliveau JW
Neuroimage; 2002 Jan; 15(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 11771984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.
Cohen D; Cuffin BN; Yunokuchi K; Maniewski R; Purcell C; Cosgrove GR; Ives J; Kennedy JG; Schomer DL
Ann Neurol; 1990 Dec; 28(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 2285267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion tensor MRI-based estimation of the influence of brain tissue anisotropy on the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
De Lucia M; Parker GJ; Embleton K; Newton JM; Walsh V
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1159-70. PubMed ID: 17524673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Babiloni C; Pizzella V; Gratta CD; Ferretti A; Romani GL
Int Rev Neurobiol; 2009; 86():67-80. PubMed ID: 19607991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the effect of volume conduction on EEG coherence with the effect of field spread on MEG coherence.
Winter WR; Nunez PL; Ding J; Srinivasan R
Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(21):3946-57. PubMed ID: 17607723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of tissue conductivity changes on the EEG signal in the human brain: a simulation study.
Jochmann T; Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 20888205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional localization of brain sources using EEG and/or MEG data: volume conductor and source models.
Lopes da Silva F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1533-8. PubMed ID: 15707802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus.
Deffke I; Sander T; Heidenreich J; Sommer W; Curio G; Trahms L; Lueschow A
Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17363282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
