BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11773162)

  • 21. Evaluation of internet websites about retinopathy of prematurity patient education.
    Martins EN; Morse LS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 89(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 15834086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The evaluation of anaesthesia-related information on the Internet.
    Corcoran TB; Ward M; Jarosz K; Schug SA
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Jan; 37(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 19157351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives on quality and content of information on the Internet.
    Stinson JN; Tucker L; Huber A; Harris H; Lin C; Cohen L; Gill N; Lukas-Bretzler J; Proulx L; Prowten D
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):1755-62. PubMed ID: 19531749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do the leading children's hospitals have quality web sites? A description of children's hospital web sites.
    Kind T; Wheeler KL; Robinson B; Cabana MD
    J Med Internet Res; 2004 Jun; 6(2):e20. PubMed ID: 15249269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiology and the internet: a systematic review of patient information resources.
    Smart JM; Burling D
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Nov; 56(11):867-70. PubMed ID: 11603887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of colposcopy information on the internet.
    Kim YT; Kim SH; Kim JW; Shin JS; Park KH
    Yonsei Med J; 2003 Apr; 44(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12728473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality evaluation of JAMA Patient Pages on diabetes using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patient (EQIP) tool.
    Vaona A; Marcon A; Rava M; Buzzetti R; Sartori M; Abbinante C; Moser A; Seddaiu A; Prontera M; Quaglio A; Pallazzoni P; Sartori V; Rigon G
    Prim Care Diabetes; 2011 Dec; 5(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 21917537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Professional information about urinary incontinence on the World Wide Web: is it timely? Is it accurate?
    Diering CL; Palmer MH
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2001 Jan; 28(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11174463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design and testing of a tool for evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites.
    Seidman JJ; Steinwachs D; Rubin HR
    J Med Internet Res; 2003 Nov; 5(4):e30. PubMed ID: 14713658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumer health information on the Internet about carpal tunnel syndrome: indicators of accuracy.
    Frické M; Fallis D; Jones M; Luszko GM
    Am J Med; 2005 Feb; 118(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 15694903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality of arthritis information on the Internet.
    Ansani NT; Vogt M; Henderson BA; McKaveney TP; Weber RJ; Smith RB; Burda M; Kwoh CK; Osial TA; Starz T
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2005 Jun; 62(11):1184-9. PubMed ID: 15984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Can Internet information on vertebroplasty be a reliable means of patient self-education?
    Sullivan TB; Anderson JT; Ahn UM; Ahn NU
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1597-604. PubMed ID: 24338042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information.
    Soot LC; Moneta GL; Edwards JM
    J Vasc Surg; 1999 Jul; 30(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 10394157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The quality of information about laparoscopic bariatric surgery on the Internet.
    Madan AK; Frantzides CT; Pesce CE
    Surg Endosc; 2003 May; 17(5):685-7. PubMed ID: 12618943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Gilliam AD; Speake WJ; Scholefield JH; Beckingham IJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Jan; 85(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 12585632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of health information on the Internet: an examination of experts' ratings.
    Craigie M; Loader B; Burrows R; Muncer S
    J Med Internet Res; 2002; 4(1):e2. PubMed ID: 11956034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The poor quality of information about laparoscopy on the World Wide Web as indexed by popular search engines.
    Allen JW; Finch RJ; Coleman MG; Nathanson LK; O'Rourke NA; Fielding GA
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):170-2. PubMed ID: 11961632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology.
    Hargrave DR; Hargrave UA; Bouffet E
    Neuro Oncol; 2006 Apr; 8(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 16533758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is current information available useful for patients and their families?
    Ellamushi H; Narenthiran G; Kitchen ND
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jul; 83(4):292-4. PubMed ID: 11518386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A critical appraisal of the use of Internet for calculating cardiovascular risk.
    Gillois P; Colombet I; Dréau H; Degoulet P; Chatellier G
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():775-9. PubMed ID: 10566465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.