These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11774942)

  • 1. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone.
    Harewood GC; Yacavone RF; Locke GR; Wiersema MJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Dec; 96(12):3312-7. PubMed ID: 11774942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
    Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of mail and telephone in assessing patient experiences in receiving care from medical group practices.
    Hepner KA; Brown JA; Hays RD
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Dec; 28(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 16272420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obtaining information on patient satisfaction with hospital care: mail versus telephone.
    Walker AH; Restuccia JD
    Health Serv Res; 1984 Aug; 19(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 6746294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outpatient satisfaction: validation of a French-language questionnaire: data quality and identification of associated factors.
    Labarère J; François P; Bertrand D; Peyrin JC; Robert C; Fourny M
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1999; 7(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10747567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
    Hall MF
    J Health Care Mark; 1995; 15(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 10142388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods.
    Fleming CM; Bowden M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jan; 90(1):284-92. PubMed ID: 18082316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Engagement and satisfaction with an Internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    van den Berg MH; Ronday HK; Peeters AJ; Voogt-van der Harst EM; Munneke M; Breedveld FC; Vliet Vlieland TP
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2007 Mar; 46(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 17043050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-physician e-mail: an opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery.
    Rosen P; Kwoh CK
    Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):701-6. PubMed ID: 17908755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient satisfaction scores for endoscopic procedures: impact of a survey-collection method.
    Lin OS; Schembre DB; Ayub K; Gluck M; McCormick SE; Patterson DJ; Cantone N; Soon MS; Kozarek RA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 May; 65(6):775-81. PubMed ID: 17466197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys.
    Maguire KB
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3528-33. PubMed ID: 19647362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internet use and e-mail communications between patients and providers: a survey of rheumatology outpatients.
    Siva C; Smarr KL; Hanson KD; Parikh M; Lawlor K; Ge B
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2008 Dec; 14(6):318-23. PubMed ID: 19033871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Follow-up after a pediatric emergency department visit: telephone versus e-mail?
    Goldman RD; Mehrotra S; Pinto TR; Mounstephen W
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):988-91. PubMed ID: 15466095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postal surveys of physicians gave superior response rates over telephone interviews in a randomized trial.
    Hocking JS; Lim MS; Read T; Hellard M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 May; 59(5):521-4. PubMed ID: 16632141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents.
    Anand SG; Feldman MJ; Geller DS; Bisbee A; Bauchner H
    Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):1283-8. PubMed ID: 15867036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures.
    Ko HH; Zhang H; Telford JJ; Enns R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Apr; 69(4):883-91, quiz 891.e1. PubMed ID: 19152911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reproducibility of pediatric information collected with various methods: postal/telephone questionnaire and direct interview].
    Currò V; Bembo V; Procaccini M; Buffetti A; Arcà M
    Pediatr Med Chir; 1992; 14(6):627-31. PubMed ID: 1298939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.