BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11776821)

  • 1. [Preoperative staging of patients with primary ovarian carcinoma by CT and MRI].
    Zhu Q; Yoshikawa H; Fujita N
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 21(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 11776821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative staging of ovarian cancer: comparison between ultrasound, CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (ISAAC study).
    Fischerova D; Pinto P; Burgetova A; Masek M; Slama J; Kocian R; Frühauf F; Zikan M; Dusek L; Dundr P; Cibula D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 59(2):248-262. PubMed ID: 33871110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging.
    Forstner R; Hricak H; Occhipinti KA; Powell CB; Frankel SD; Stern JL
    Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):619-26. PubMed ID: 7480729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of MRI, CT and findings in staging of gynecologic malignancies].
    Lorenzen M; Braun J; Gehrckens A; Nicolas V
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Nov; 8(6):266-72. PubMed ID: 9894525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
    Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
    Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
    BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
    Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US).
    Nishimura K; Hida S; Nishio Y; Ohishi K; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nishibuchi S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1988 Sep; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 3045372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of MRI and CT for predicting the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) preoperatively in patients being considered for cytoreductive surgical procedures.
    Low RN; Barone RM; Lucero J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 22(5):1708-15. PubMed ID: 25201499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic value of PET/CT is similar to that of conventional MRI and even better for detecting small peritoneal implants in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
    Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Bakir B; Iyibozkurt C; Ozel S; Has D; Yilmaz E; Topuz S; Yavuz E; Unal SN; Mudun A
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 May; 33(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 22357440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The diagnosis of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of ovarian carcinoma].
    Mizuno K
    Rinsho Byori; 1992 Feb; 40(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 1583787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis in the restaging of patient with ovarian cancer as compared to contrast enhanced CT and tumor marker Ca-125.
    Rubini G; Altini C; Notaristefano A; Merenda N; Rubini D; Ianora AA; Asabella AN
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23948509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of diagnostic methods in ovarian carcinoma with emphasis on CT and MRI.
    Buist MR; Golding RP; Burger CW; Vermorken JB; Kenemans P; Schutter EM; Baak JP; Heitbrink MA; Falke TH
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Feb; 52(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 8314138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of retrospective image fusion of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI.
    Kanda T; Kitajima K; Suenaga Y; Konishi J; Sasaki R; Morimoto K; Saito M; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Sugimura K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2005-10. PubMed ID: 23891295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical usefulness of [18F]FDG PET-CT and CT/MRI for detecting nodal metastasis in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Shin NY; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Koh YW; Sohn B; Kim J
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):994-9. PubMed ID: 25201502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography as a predictor of the extent of the disease and surgical outcomes in ovarian cancer.
    Cerci ZC; Sakarya DK; Yetimalar MH; Bezircioglu I; Kasap B; Baser E; Yucel K
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 27304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology.
    Castellucci P; Perrone AM; Picchio M; Ghi T; Farsad M; Nanni C; Messa C; Meriggiola MC; Pelusi G; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fazio F; Fanti S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Aug; 28(8):589-95. PubMed ID: 17625380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Role of X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of gynecological malignant tumor].
    Suzuki M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):942-52. PubMed ID: 2809344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Region-based diagnostic performance of multidetector CT for detecting peritoneal seeding in ovarian cancer patients.
    Choi HJ; Lim MC; Bae J; Cho KS; Jung DC; Kang S; Yoo CW; Seo SS; Park SY
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Feb; 283(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 20376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of tumor recurrence in patients with carcinoma of the ovaries.
    Kainz C; Prayer L; Gitsch G; Stiglbauer R; Kramer J; Reinthaller A; Kölbl H
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Mar; 178(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 8149015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.