BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11777506)

  • 1. Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hansen SL; Clark SL; Foster JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11777506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.
    Lemos A; Amorim MM; Dornelas de Andrade A; de Souza AI; Cabral Filho JE; Correia JB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Oct; (10):CD009124. PubMed ID: 26451755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being: a randomized clinical trial.
    Simpson KR; James DC
    Nurs Res; 2005; 54(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 15897790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed versus immediate pushing in second stage of labor.
    Kelly M; Johnson E; Lee V; Massey L; Purser D; Ring K; Sanderson S; Styles J; Wood D
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 20215948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia.
    Gillesby E; Burns S; Dempsey A; Kirby S; Mogensen K; Naylor K; Petrella J; Vanicelli R; Whelan B
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2010; 39(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 21044148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of delayed pushing with epidural anesthesia: findings from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Mayberry LJ; Hammer R; Kelly C; True-Driver B; De A
    J Perinatol; 1999 Jan; 19(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10685198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Szu LT; Chou PY; Lin PH; Chen C; Lin WL; Chen KH
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):481-499. PubMed ID: 32990782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of spontaneous pushing versus Valsalva pushing in the second stage of labour on mother and fetus: a systematic review of randomised trials.
    Prins M; Boxem J; Lucas C; Hutton E
    BJOG; 2011 May; 118(6):662-70. PubMed ID: 21392242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pushing techniques during the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial.
    Koyucu RG; Demirci N
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 56(5):606-612. PubMed ID: 29037544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor.
    Brancato RM; Church S; Stone PW
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2008; 37(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 18226152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural analgesia in labour.
    Maresh M; Choong KH; Beard RW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Jul; 90(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 6871129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delayed versus early pushing during the second stage of labour in primigravidas under epidural anaesthesia with occipitoposterior malposition: a randomised controlled study.
    Saad H; Maged AM; Meshaal H; Hassan SM; Kamel A; Salah E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 33892614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance.
    Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Malinow AM; Kopelman JN; Weiner CP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1339-44. PubMed ID: 12066119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Mascio D; Saccone G; Bellussi F; Al-Kouatly HB; Brunelli R; Benedetti Panici P; Liberati M; D'Antonio F; Berghella V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):189-203. PubMed ID: 32067972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia.
    Plunkett BA; Lin A; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Peaceman AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 12850615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence.
    Fitzpatrick M; Harkin R; McQuillan K; O'Brien C; O'Connell PR; O'Herlihy C
    BJOG; 2002 Dec; 109(12):1359-65. PubMed ID: 12504971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Cahill AG; Srinivas SK; Tita ATN; Caughey AB; Richter HE; Gregory WT; Liu J; Woolfolk C; Weinstein DL; Mathur AM; Macones GA; Tuuli MG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1444-1454. PubMed ID: 30304425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alternative to intensive management of the active phase of the second stage of labor: a multicenter randomized trial (Phase Active du Second STade trial) among nulliparous women with an epidural.
    Le Ray C; Rozenberg P; Kayem G; Harvey T; Sibiude J; Doret M; Parant O; Fuchs F; Vardon D; Azria E; Sénat MV; Ceccaldi PF; Seco A; Garabedian C; Chantry AA;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 227(4):639.e1-639.e15. PubMed ID: 35868416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does delayed pushing in the second stage of labor impact perinatal outcomes?
    Frey HA; Tuuli MG; Cortez S; Odibo AO; Roehl KA; Shanks AL; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Nov; 29(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 22773293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: a randomised controlled trial.
    Vause S; Congdon HM; Thornton JG
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Feb; 105(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 9501784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.