122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11778162)
1. The effect of plate luting on reduction accuracy and biomechanics of acetabular osteotomies stabilized with 2.7-mm reconstruction plates.
Anderson GM; Cross AR; Lewis DD; Lanz OI
Vet Surg; 2002; 31(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 11778162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical evaluation and assessment of the accuracy of reduction of two methods of acetabular osteotomy fixation in dogs.
Stubbs WP; Lewis DD; Miller GJ; Quarterman C; Hosgood G
Vet Surg; 1998; 27(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 9749513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of the 2.4 mm uniLOCK reconstruction plate using 2.4 mm locking versus standard screws for fixation of acetabular osteotomy in dogs.
Amato NS; Richards A; Knight TA; Spector D; Boudrieau RJ; Belkoff S
Vet Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(8):741-8. PubMed ID: 19121169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study.
Kloc PA; Kowaleski MP; Litsky AS; Brown NO; Johnson KA
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19152616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of two plating techniques for fixation of acetabular osteotomies in dogs.
Hardie RJ; Bertram JE; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(3):148-53. PubMed ID: 10338159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical comparison of screw and wire fixation with and without polymethylmethacrylate re-enforcement for acetabular osteotomy stabilization in dogs.
Lanz OI; Lewis DD; Madison JB; Miller GJ; Martin DE
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 10338161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of pelvic osteotomy plate type on axial rotation of the acetabular segment in the triple pelvic osteotomy.
Clark B; Wallace LJ; Pacchiana P
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 16594215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation?
Kistler BJ; Smithson IR; Cooper SA; Cox JL; Nayak AN; Santoni BG; Sagi HC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Nov; 472(11):3353-61. PubMed ID: 25080262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ex vivo mechanical evaluation of single versus double semitubular plate fixation of a transverse distal-third scapular osteotomy in the dog.
Mair JJ; Belkoff SM; Boudrieau RJ
Vet Surg; 2003; 32(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 14648538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of external skeletal fixation and plating for the stabilization of ilial osteotomies in dogs.
Fitzpatrick N; Lewis D; Cross A
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 18704242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro evaluation of plate luting using osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones with a limited contact-dynamic compression plate.
Sod GA; Hubert JD; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2005; 34(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 16343146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduction and temporary stabilization of acetabular fractures using ASIF mandibular reduction forceps: technique and results using plate fixation in 25 dogs.
Boswell KA; Boone EG; Boudrieau RJ
Vet Surg; 2001; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11172455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Fixation Techniques for Acetabular Fractures Involving the Anterior Column with Disruption of the Quadrilateral Plate: A Biomechanical Study.
May C; Egloff M; Butscher A; Keel MJB; Aebi T; Siebenrock KA; Bastian JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jun; 100(12):1047-1054. PubMed ID: 29916932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of four interfragmentary Kirschner wire configurations as a component of screw/wire/polymethylmethacrylate fixation for acetabular fractures in dogs.
Beaver DP; Lewis DD; Lanz OI; Madison JB; Kubilis PS
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2000; 36(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 10997523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of different fixation techniques for fractures of the acetabular posterior wall.
Wu X
Int Orthop; 2018 Mar; 42(3):673-679. PubMed ID: 29349502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Methods for Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum: Conventional Reconstruction Plate vs. Spring Plate vs. Variable Angle Locking Compression Plate.
Chung H; Sohn HS; Oh JK; Lee S; Kim D
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May; 60(6):. PubMed ID: 38929499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Locking Plate Fixation for Canine Acetabular Fractures.
Piana F; Solano M; Kalff S; Yeadon R
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Jul; 33(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 32349136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of canine acetabular fractures stabilized with an acetabular plate.
Anson LW; DeYoung DJ; Richardson DC; Betts CW
Vet Surg; 1988; 17(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 3238894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [BIOMECHANICS STUDY ON ACETABULAR POSTERIOR WALL FRACTURE].
Tang Y; Hu Xiaopeng ; Lu X; Zhang Y; Zhang C; Wang P; Zhao X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Aug; 29(8):925-30. PubMed ID: 26677610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of 2.7 mm string-of-pearl plate versus screw/wire/Polymethylmethacrylate composite fixation and 2.7 mm veterinary acetabular plate for repair of simulated canine acetabular fractures.
Blakely JA; Butler JR; Priddy LB; McCabe EM; Avendaño JN; Elder SH; Wills R
BMC Vet Res; 2019 Aug; 15(1):287. PubMed ID: 31399093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
