These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

948 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11778677)

  • 1. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data.
    Sinharay S; Stern HS; Russell D
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 11778675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
    Collins LM; Schafer JL; Kam CM
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):330-51. PubMed ID: 11778676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling.
    Allison PD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):545-57. PubMed ID: 14674868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.
    Marsh HW; Wen Z; Hau KT
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):275-300. PubMed ID: 15355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Expected versus observed information in SEM with incomplete normal and nonnormal data.
    Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Dec; 15(4):352-67. PubMed ID: 20853954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality.
    Shin T; Davison ML; Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):426-449. PubMed ID: 27709974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bootstrapping the estimated latent distribution of the two-parameter latent trait model.
    Knott M; Tzamourani P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):175-91. PubMed ID: 17535586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust model fitting for the non linear structural equation model under normal theory.
    Xia YM; Song XY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):529-68. PubMed ID: 19040790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data.
    Furlow CF; Beretvas SN
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):227-54. PubMed ID: 15998179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MCMC estimation for the p(2) network regression model with crossed random effects.
    Zijlstra BJ; van Duijn MA; Snijders TA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):143-66. PubMed ID: 19208289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood methods for regression models with expensive variables missing by design.
    Zhao Y; Lawless JF; McLeish DL
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 19197954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two methods for the estimation of precision with incomplete longitudinal data, jointly modelled with a time-to-event outcome.
    Touloumi G; Babiker AG; Kenward MG; Pocock SJ; Darbyshire JH
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(20):3161-75. PubMed ID: 14518021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New approaches to missing data in psychological research: introduction to the special section.
    West SG
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):315-6. PubMed ID: 11778674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.