168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11778978)
1. Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: how well are we doing?
Marteau TM; Dormandy E
Am J Med Genet; 2001; 106(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 11778978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cultural variation in values attached to informed choice in the context of prenatal diagnosis.
van den Heuvel A; Marteau TM
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 13(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 18255366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal diagnosis: chances, choices.
Roberts SF
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 9379162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Pregnant women's assessment and level of knowledge of prenatal counseling].
Tschudin S; Holzgreve W; Conde N; Alder J; Bitzer J; Tercanli S
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Apr; 30(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 18484059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1414-9. PubMed ID: 17260214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities to improve women's informed decision making: a cluster randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN22532458].
Nagle C; Gunn J; Bell R; Lewis S; Meiser B; Metcalfe S; Ukoumunne OC; Halliday J
BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 18190370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects.
Jaques AM; Bell RJ; Watson L; Halliday JL
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun; 44(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 15191448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
Soc Sci Med; 2008 Feb; 66(3):753-64. PubMed ID: 17996350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus.
Rowe H; Fisher J; Quinlivan J
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Mar; 30(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19308781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Congenital anomalies: parents' anxiety and women's concerns before prenatal testing and women's opinions towards the risk factors.
Sahin NH; Gungor I
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 18279286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening for thalassemia: a description of written information given to pregnant women in Europe and beyond.
Van den Heuvel A; Hollywood A; Hogg J; Dormandy E; Chitty L; Kabra M; Ma R; Masturzo B; Marteau TM
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Aug; 28(8):727-34. PubMed ID: 18655228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing?
Remennick L
Sociol Health Illn; 2006 Jan; 28(1):21-53. PubMed ID: 16509941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Undergoing prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia.
Hall S; Chitty L; Dormandy E; Hollywood A; Wildschut HI; Fortuny A; Masturzo B; Santavý J; Kabra M; Ma R; Marteau TM
Eur J Hum Genet; 2007 May; 15(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17311082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21.
Nicolaides KH; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Avgidou K; Papageorghiou A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 16098850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.
Bekker HL; Hewison J; Thornton JG
Prenat Diagn; 2004 Apr; 24(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 15065100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis.
Newson AJ
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Apr; 13(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 18243828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
